Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Open\s+logs\s+in\s+2008\s+Russian\s+DX\s+Contest\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "José Nunes CT1BOH" <ct1boh@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:54:05 +0000
Great news! Russian DX Contest wil adopt, starting in 2008, Open Log Policy http://www.radio-sport.net/rdxc08_pre.htm Also good to know RDXC asks every participant to keep exact CAT frequencies in th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00223.html (6,957 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:49:17 +0100
Bad news: they want qrp stations to sign call/qrp. That is not allowed in Germany. Only /m, /mm, /am and /p is possible 73 Peter Great news! Russian DX Contest wil adopt, starting in 2008, Open Log P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00224.html (7,880 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:53:53 +0200
No problem, this is just recommendation by them and they are emphasizing it more to Russian stations and acknowledging it is not possible by many foreigners. So don't worry. Definitely good news RDCX
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00225.html (9,808 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:28:12 +0500
Thats weird, but English page says this is not mandatory requirement. I suspect english rules have the latest update while german rules were made quite a long time ago. So you can enter the QRP categ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00226.html (7,823 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
I think signing /QRP is rather silly and counterproductive in general during a contest. It does not benefit either operator and complicates the exchange. Why make a challenging QSO even more difficul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00233.html (10,440 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Igor Booklan SRR <ra3auu@srr.ru>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:29:43 +0300
Peter, Just got back from VP6DX .. do you know how many /QRP from Europe we have in our log ?? I believe rules in Germany and Europe are the same. Does it mean their Qs are not valid? Anyway, in RDXC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00234.html (9,745 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:39:47 -0700
It seems like the Russian DX Contest has a couple of good ideas: * Open logs * Explicit prohibition against self-spotting * Explicit prohibition against using multiple call signs to support one score
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00235.html (10,846 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:41:12 -0700
But why is it recommended? I consider it poor operating practice. -- Kenneth E. Harker WM5R kenharker@kenharker.com http://www.kenharker.com/ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00236.html (8,582 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:37:05 +0500
I think its about cheating. -- RX9TX "I may not be totally perfect, but parts of me are excellent." [Ashleigh Brilliant] _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00239.html (8,838 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:46:08 -0500
Unfortunately, this explanation makes as little sense as the original recommendation. If someone is predisposed to cheating on power, would he not also be predisposed to cheating by signing /QRP? A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00241.html (9,141 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:51:08 -0600
That... would be a really good reason that they aren't going to hear WC7S... in any / something. And I am not in Germany, either. --... ...--Dale - WC7S in Wy>> Bad news: they want qrp stations to si
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00245.html (9,517 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:31:58 +0200
Hello, RDXC delivered at least my award in 14-15 months after the 2006 contest. Not at all bad achievement ! That is one key criteria for evaluating contest organisers devotion for their own contest.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00246.html (11,284 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:14:05 -0700
Or if I were running HP I could sign /QRP if I wanted to. Adding QRP doesn't help anything--anyone can do it. 73 Tom W7WHY I think signing /QRP is rather silly and counterproductive in general during
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00248.html (9,279 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:55:27 +0500
How about the fact that number of submitted logs (and therefore number of participants) in RDXC is greater then in WPX and a way more then in ARRL? How about the fact that RDXC worth more points for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00249.html (10,920 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:25:44 +0500
Hello, Kelly, please feel free to send your opinion or proposals directly to the contest sponsors :) -- RX9TX "The great tragedy of Science -- the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact."
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00250.html (9,159 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:36:50 -0500
Here's why signing /QRP is a really bad idea: (using ARRL DX exchange only as an example) Ve4xt test DJ6RZ/garble DJ6RZ/? 599 k DJ6Rgarble/garble DJ6RZ/? DJ6RZ/garbleP And so on.... When I hear / I a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00256.html (12,722 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Val" <val@vip.bg>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:45:30 +0200
Actually the facts are opposite: CQWPX 2007 Phone - 3076 logs RDXC 2007 - 3060 logs _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00396.html (9,157 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Val" <val@vip.bg>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:00:47 +0200
Igor, I'm sorry for hitting the send key before signing the message. Nevertheless you are claiming something without submitting any evidence. The results of the last phone WPX (2007) are available on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00451.html (10,037 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:39:25 +0500
Val, RDXC reveals the total number of received logs explicitly. You can get it here. http://www.rdxc.org/asp/pages/stat_c.asp?ID=0 WPX 2006 article results does not do that . You have to count it man
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00460.html (11,417 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Igor Booklan <ra3auu@srr.ru>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:56:57 +0300
The RDXC numbers are: 2001 - 1242 logs 2002 - 1304 logs 2003 - 1671 logs 2004 - 2011 logs 2005 - 2579 logs 2006 - 2863 logs 2007 - 3060 logs 73s, Harry RA3AUU ________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00462.html (10,269 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu