Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+PJ2T\s+CQWW\s+CW\s+Photos\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+PJ2T\s+CQWW\s+CW\s+Photos\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] PJ2T CQWW CW Photos (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:41:40 -0500; I have posted some of my photos from the 2003 CQWW CW Multi-2 operation at Signal Point (PJ2T). Ops for CQWW CW at PJ2T were W0CG/PJ2DX, K4BAI, K8MFO, S50R, W8WTS, N8BJQ, and K8ND. http://home.columb; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00253.html (8,203 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] PJ2T CQWW CW Photos (score: 1): Author: Geoff Howard <ghoward@kent.edu>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:11:28 -0500; Contesters, You might enjoy the pictures from the PJ2T CQWW CW effort last November. See http://asgard.kent.edu/ccc/cqww.cw.2003.htm and click on the "Photos" link. The full log and contest stats are; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00328.html (7,825 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ2T CQWW CW Photos (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:49:05 +0100; Yes UBN checking will be very interesting, CT9L is only 29169 points behind. Since CT9L score never got on 3830 this is the score that was sent in to CQ: Q Z C 160 285 13 61 80 1137 22 93 40 2298 36; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00343.html (8,930 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] PJ2T CQWW CW Photos (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:24:15 -0500; A very tight Multi-2 competition for the 2003 CQWW CW! Here's a band-by-band listing of PJ2T and CT9L, for comparison. It's clear that our points-perQSO value was a bit higher, overcoming their highe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00348.html (12,330 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]