Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Packet\s+Cheating\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Packet\s+Cheating\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] packet cheating (score: 1): Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com); Date: Fri Dec 17 21:27:15 1999; << I have heard SOAB stations running, and then I Sometimes they just know! If one spends some time on the bands here and there outside of the contests, one will learn how the bands "work." It's freq; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00195.html (6,801 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheating (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Fri May 22 09:15:01 1998; That's not what I'm talking about - I mean the guy that doesn't log on, but monitors for spots (and there are programs that let you do just that) then somehow "magically" appears on frequency within; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00224.html (8,783 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheating (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri May 22 12:39:05 1998; Ward...you have some good observations here. Out here in Kansas....clusters are not available. Nadda! Not a one. So, I can't even cheat. Even if I got on the Internet, to a domestic cluster I doubt i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00228.html (8,046 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] packet cheating (score: 1): Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (Doug KR2Q); Date: Fri May 22 18:16:37 1998; << Yes, it's an "empty victory" for the cheater, but also a real disappointment for the legitimate player who rapidly loses motivation to go up against these guys year after year. >> Look....the firs; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00232.html (6,893 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheating (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:18:03 -0500 (GMT-05:00); If you really want to nail packet cheaters...do it in Sweepstakes where it isn't allowed for single op or ARRL 10 etc. I think the easiest way to cross the ethics 101 boundry mentioned by K4XS is to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00302.html (8,033 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheating (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:30:02 -0500; extent. CQ WW does enforce it, but you may need to call it to their attention to check. This was most obvious when an SOSB station was turning in mults equivalent to the top multi-multi's. After not; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00311.html (7,390 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheating (score: 1): Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:56:42 -0800; Packet is allowed in SS for single op. It is the SO Unlimited category. 73, Jim N6VH snip..... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00358.html (7,544 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]