Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Pandemic\s+impact\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Pandemic\s+impact\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Pandemic impact (score: 1): Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 19:49:48 +0000; Want to see how the Covid-19 pandemic has impacted contesting? WPX was the first major contest to feel the effects. See https://cqwpx.com/stats.htm to view how entries soared with everyone at home. W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00076.html (6,692 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pandemic impact (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:52:30 -0500; Was it just me or were conditions really bad for CQWW RTTY? 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00077.html (7,917 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pandemic impact (score: 1): Author: Michael Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT); No doubt! I normally have "fun first" multi-single or multi-two efforts from my QTH in the big tests, but now it's limited to lonely SO efforts for the time being. Hopefully by next contest season th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00078.html (7,893 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pandemic impact (score: 1): Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 21:18:33 +0000; They were not great. I worked only a few Russians and did not work a JA on any band. Lets hope for much better 28 days later for WW SSB! A big part of the game is dealing with whatever the sun gives; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00079.html (9,672 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pandemic impact (score: 1): Author: Richard DiDonna <richnn3w@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 17:39:11 -0400; Late October certainly changes the sunlight factor. CQWW SSB certainly more popular than the RYRY test. I would say the major fear regarding CQWW SSB is the fact that its going to be exactly 28 or 29; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00080.html (11,408 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pandemic impact (score: 1): Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 21:52:36 +0000 (UTC); One more anecdotal observation: In the past few years in the Ohio QSO Party as a mobile, I had around 850 QSOs. This past August I had 1470! A few other factors were in play, the State QSO Party Chal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00081.html (8,919 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pandemic impact (score: 1): Author: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 21:54:58 +0000 (UTC); Conditions were poor at my QTH (latitude 42N) on 40m. Kp fluctuated from high to lower to higher. I worked hard for a modest score. I certainly hope things are better for the upcoming contests. 73,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00082.html (9,567 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pandemic impact (score: 1): Author: af5cc2 <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 16:58:53 -0500; I heard very little DX that entire weekend with my little pistol station. Mostly just Central America with a few South Americans thrown in.73 John AF5CC Sent via the Samsung Galaxy A10e, an AT&T 4G; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00083.html (9,314 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]