Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Phone\s+Phollies\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Phone\s+Phollies\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Phone Phollies (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:48:32 -0800; Just some of the usual grouchy post-contest observations... 1) Geez - some UGLY signals out there, especially on 40, it seemed. Guys - back off on the drive! Yes - I had my noise blanker OFF, preamp; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00585.html (8,296 bytes)
2. RE: [CQ-Contest] Phone Phollies (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:51:13 -0700; Only had a few of these and they threw me. I sent nearly all my reports with my own voice. Mike W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00588.html (7,335 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Phone Phollies (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:52:37 -0800; Great advice, Ward. I would add that it is a great idea to listen to yourself on a 2nd rig (with the appropriate amount of extra attenuation added in of course). Monitor circuits often don't tell the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00590.html (9,923 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Phone Phollies (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 22 Nov 2004 23:33:57 -0600; May I echo Ward's comment, in my case with regard to the high bands? One station Sunday afternoon could be heard over at least 50KHz worth of 20 meters. Nobody else was that bad but 15-20KHz was not; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00617.html (7,800 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]