- 1. [CQ-Contest] Promote this WRTC callsigns (score: 1)
- Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
- Date: Thu Apr 13 09:42:51 2000
- So why not to use S5AA - S5AZ and say S5NA - S5NZ for WRTC competitors? Seem much better than confusing and long S511A, etc. Prefix for WPX awards is only first two or three letters, any other letter
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-04/msg00041.html (7,920 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Promote this WRTC callsigns (score: 1)
- Author: ve3kz@netcom.ca (Bob Nash)
- Date: Fri Apr 14 10:19:08 2000
- The Oscar for the best calls go jointly to S544Z and S566Z both 59 bits, short and those lovely double numbers. The worst call award is a four way tie between S561C, S517W, S571W, and S568Y, all 65 b
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-04/msg00049.html (9,031 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Promote this WRTC callsigns (score: 1)
- Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
- Date: Fri Apr 14 20:05:31 2000
- << The Oscar for the best calls go jointly to S544Z and S566Z both 59 bits, >> What if you use cut numbers? S511E is then SeaaE de Q (vy TIC) -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-conte
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-04/msg00050.html (7,927 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Promote this WRTC callsigns (score: 1)
- Author: k7qq@juno.com (Rex J Maner)
- Date: Sun Apr 16 15:03:40 2000
- Sounds like a good IDEA however how do one send " Lower Case " letters ? Quack ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offer
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-04/msg00051.html (7,798 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] Promote this WRTC callsigns (score: 1)
- Author: n0ss@earthlink.net (Tom Hammond NØSS)
- Date: Sun Apr 16 11:22:25 2000
- Well... THAT's OBVIOUS... you use QRP! Tom N0SS -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-04/msg00053.html (7,250 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu