Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Proposal\s+for\s+keeping\s+UNassisted\s+category\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Proposal for keeping UNassisted category (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:10:31 +0100 (CET)
Please do not spoil the fun of SO contenders by deleting the category for whatever reason. Instead, change people behavior. Make assisted/all allowed category MORE interesting for the cheaters: - Rai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00233.html (7,901 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal for keeping UNassisted category (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:49:27 -0600 (CST)
Wait... So because of cheaters, you want us (the contest community, collectively, including sponsors, log checkers, and operators) to penalize those who (for whatever reason) prefer SO by making it l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00236.html (8,651 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal for keeping UNassisted category (score: 1)
Author: "Roberto Rey" <cwdude@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:24:19 -0500
+1 ...yeah that is ridiculous... change the world becasue of the cheaters.. bizarro world 73 de HK3CW Rob -- Original Message -- From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net> To: <pa5mw@home.nl>; <c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00243.html (10,433 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal for keeping UNassisted category (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:15:09 +0000
Seems to me, that SO.. has become "contaminated" and, those "contaminating" the SO group, are joined in their efforts across the rest of the classes of entry. THEY know who they are, THEY know what t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00245.html (9,154 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal for keeping UNassisted category (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:29:12 +0000
I don't get why the people who want to get rid of the unassisted category do but apparently they've salivated at the prospect for a long time. I don't know why. Maybe they want to see if they can bea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00248.html (11,609 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal for keeping UNassisted category (score: 1)
Author: MARK BAILEY <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:45:09 -0500 (EST)
I enjoy single operator categories and do not want to see them eliminated. In at least many contests, the Assisted/Unlimited classes evolved from MULTI-OPERATOR categories - this is true of many of t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00249.html (11,024 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal for keeping UNassisted category (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:12:00 +0100
Please RE-read the subject; "Proposal for keeping..." meaning I am trying to offer an alternative BEFORE the contest organisations decide to combine SO & SOA. The angle here is I do not want the "bow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00269.html (10,437 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu