Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Public\s+Logs\,\s+etc\.\?\s+Who\s+Cares\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Public\s+Logs\,\s+etc\.\?\s+Who\s+Cares\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Public Logs, etc.? Who Cares? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Mackanos - K2DB" <k2db@k2db.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:57:13 -0400; All this stuff about "secrets", whatever is a bunch of gobbligoo. I may stand to be corrected, but I personally "SHARE" any info, equipment set-ups, everything with anyone who wants it. Why? Because; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00254.html (8,250 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs, etc.? Who Cares? (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:00:27 -0400; Paul, You bring up an interesting point. If there are no "secrets" left (W2LC's very interesting post notwithstanding), then why is there such a push to mandate Open Logs? The only reason I seem to s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00255.html (10,377 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs, etc.? Who Cares? (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:46:59 -0500; .... Quite possibly... In all seriousness, I can see considerable logistical difficulty in keeping track of which logs are supposed to be closed & which are to be open. And considerable bad blood if; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00263.html (8,286 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]