Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QRZ\s+with\s+no\s+call\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QRZ\s+with\s+no\s+call\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QRZ with no call (score: 1): Author: n7df@zianet.com (Larry N7DF); Date: Thu Apr 3 07:39:13 2003; I disagree that calling QRZ without a call increases the effective rate. My policy is to listen for one go around to see if the station gives his call. If he doesn't give it after one more QSO I will; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00079.html (7,451 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] QRZ with no call (score: 1): Author: mark@concertart.com (Mark Beckwith); Date: Thu Apr 3 09:45:09 2003; Have you used the technique? That's why a savvy user of this technique will send "R" instead of "QRZ?" Or, better still (giving away secrets here) a savvy operator will send NOTHING and wait for som; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00093.html (7,869 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] QRZ with no call (score: 1): Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor); Date: Thu Apr 3 21:04:15 2003; It seems clear that a distinction need be drawn between those who do the above well and those who don't. Having done it, I think, well, I guarantee beyond a shadow of a doubt that it increases rate,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00102.html (8,305 bytes)
4. Fw: [CQ-Contest] QRZ with no call (score: 1): Author: k7qq@netzero.net (Rex Maner); Date: Fri Apr 4 05:26:38 2003; QUACKS I gotta disagree with the NO call QRZ, I don't like to tune across 10 M for the 50 th time on Sunday and some S.A. station who is s-9 here and has about 10 callers who obviously are not vy lou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00105.html (10,353 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] QRZ with no call (score: 1): Author: mark@concertart.com (Mark Beckwith); Date: Sat Apr 5 17:10:04 2003; It is easy to oversimplify this question. I never said I send "QRZ." I send "R". You're fooling yourself to equate your not working me with reducing my rate. You're also making the assumption in the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00132.html (8,442 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]