Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QRZ\s+without\s+giving\s+call\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QRZ\s+without\s+giving\s+call\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call (score: 1): Author: n7df@netmdc.com (N7DF); Date: Wed Mar 10 15:21:00 1999; If anyone should be penalized, it is the operator who makes multiple = contacts without giving his call. Of course he may be getting a penalty = already in excessive duplicate contacts. The thing is,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00172.html (8,564 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed Mar 10 20:22:17 1999; That's why there is a new Q signal: QDC? What's your damn call? Actually I intentionally dupe these jerks. Why should I be the only one whose time is wasted? Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- CQ-Contest on WWW:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00175.html (7,736 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call (score: 1): Author: n6ws@msn.com (Bill & Chris Shell); Date: Wed Mar 10 18:26:28 1999; Steve, I agree with you, 100% I don't wait either, if the call isn't given, I'm calling immediately. It's faster call the station and ask him his call after the exchange than wait. If I dupe someone; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00178.html (8,638 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Thu Mar 11 10:54:23 1999; If you ask for the call AFTER the exchange as Bill, N6WS suggests, you may well be ignored, or not even heard as the offending CQer hits the F1 button after you say or send your exchange. Probably it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00184.html (7,578 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call (score: 1): Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough); Date: Thu Mar 11 09:27:15 1999; Who is wasting whose time? You are the one sitting there, not moving the dial, getting yourself frustrated. Don't let yourself waste time like that, and don't get yourself all worked up, just grab t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00187.html (8,461 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Thu Mar 11 11:05:47 1999; I also wish everyone would send their call after every contact, but some of these suggestions are just silly. Penalizing a station for not sending his call? How are you going to enforce that? Many op; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00189.html (8,482 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call (score: 1): Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III); Date: Thu Mar 11 10:48:45 1999; I highly suggest that everyone go back and reread what I think is one of the best posts ever made on this topic. I suggest it be read carefully. You can find it at: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00190.html (8,254 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Thu Mar 11 17:44:56 1999; you Exactamente, Señor!! At XA5T, I made it a point to use our call after every QSO. It was amazing how many times I was asked for our call. I cannot believe they just spun onto the freq and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00194.html (8,194 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call (score: 1): Author: no6x@inreach.com (Mike Nash, NO6X); Date: Thu Mar 11 22:54:25 1999; you This is very true. Operating from Z3 last year before the WPX contest I had to sign Z38/NO6X. now that gets to be a little bit of a mouthful, so in larger pileups I would refrain and only give i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00196.html (8,120 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]