Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSO\s+Party\s+Spam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSO\s+Party\s+Spam\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: k8cc@comcast.net (David A. Pruett); Date: Sat Apr 5 10:43:53 2003; I'm going to ask this question only once, then I will shut up on this subject. How do the participants in this reflector feel about receiving what amounts to press releases about state QSO parties ev; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00119.html (9,672 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: contesting@eircom.net (Tim Makins, EI8IC); Date: Sat Apr 5 18:04:13 2003; I have no problem receiving these posts. This is the Contest Reflector after all, and anyway, the volume of mail on this reflector is not exactly huge. Anything that encourages contesting is fine wit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00121.html (8,815 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: eric@K3NA.ORG (Eric Scace K3NA); Date: Sat Apr 5 12:19:53 2003; Dave -- Thanks for bringing up the topic in such a graceful manner. As you pointed out, if every contest's sponsor sent out frequent promotional emails, the volume of traffic would be burdensome. My; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00122.html (8,059 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: k5iid@ntelos.net (Tom Horton); Date: Sat Apr 5 18:22:37 2003; Dave, Personally, I have no problem with the state party promos. FQP would be nowhere as popular as it now is without all the advertising. It has grown in a very few years to be probably the number t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00123.html (12,293 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Sat Apr 5 13:04:29 2003; State & Regional QSO Parties are contests. I have no problem with a reasonable amount of announcements from the contest sponsors. What is reasonable? Off hand, I'd say one short announcement/reminder; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00125.html (12,112 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup); Date: Sat Apr 5 12:09:26 2003; I have a well-oiled delete key, but I would think that it might be appropriate to announce the contest once, around a month before it happens, and then once more a few days before it happens. This sh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00126.html (8,122 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor); Date: Sat Apr 5 12:11:24 2003; Hi Dave, I really don't have a problem with QSO parties promoting themselves on here. Certainly, some QSO parties are more, shall we say, without denigrating any, significant than others. I am more l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00127.html (12,033 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: henry@summitschool.com (Henry); Date: Sat Apr 5 14:50:30 2003; As a QSO party chair, I would like to see one announcement per event. While I'd love to pile on heaps of announcements about our party, I know its annoying. We do one announcement to CQ-contest, and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00128.html (12,505 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com (Blake M. Meinecke); Date: Sat Apr 5 18:06:47 2003; I don't think the QSO party traffic is any more burdensom than scads of recent messages about how the crusty old guys called CQ in the "days-o-yore"..... Blake N4GI; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00131.html (7,889 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: mark@concertart.com (Mark Beckwith); Date: Sat Apr 5 20:51:14 2003; Dave, K8CC, asked: amounts I don't mind it from Jim because, well, he's JIM, if you know what I mean. We ALL have family members we're embarrassed to admit to. But seriously: Jim has done a fabulous,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00134.html (9,296 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: N4KM@aol.com (N4KM@aol.com); Date: Sat Apr 5 23:29:40 2003; Here is the way I see it. That is what the delete key is for. If you want to read it, read it. If you want to delete it, delete it. I sure don't read every e-mail that comes to my address. My 2 cents; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00135.html (7,909 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: ludal@dmv.com (Dallas Carter); Date: Sun Apr 6 10:44:24 2003; I think QSO Party promos are more on point than a lot of the other topics that are discussed here ad nauseum. This is, after all, a contest reflector. W3PP; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00138.html (7,754 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup); Date: Sun Apr 6 11:09:52 2003; Hey, I like to discuss "days-o-yore"! I'm not the oldest fish in the lake, but in another week I'll have been licensed 36 years. I was just thinking about my first SS ... 73, Zack W9SZ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00142.html (8,424 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun Apr 6 15:11:34 2003; advance. I couldn't have said it better myself. I'll bet you a nickel that state QSO parties would have more activity if they actually PROMOTED them. An "Oh, by the way, this weekend is the Podunk QS; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00145.html (8,553 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: k5iid@ntelos.net (Tom Horton); Date: Sun Apr 6 21:28:33 2003; Steve, Exactly right! Those contests that are popular and are growing..CA, PA, TX, MN, etc are very focused on getting the "outsiders" on the air, promoting that all their counties will be on(if poss; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00148.html (8,136 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: k1my@msn.com (bruce makas); Date: Sun Apr 6 14:33:55 2003; As long as it's contest related I'm all for it. What I am NOT for is more rules and regulations; they then spawn further e mails about people breaking the rules. Just let it be. I have a delete key a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00149.html (12,187 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com (Cqtestk4xs@aol.com); Date: Sun Apr 6 22:50:33 2003; Thank you Steve (K7LXC) for the kind words about the FCG and FQP. Our officers have busted butt to bring the Florida QSO Party a new life. Back in the 1980s WC4E and myself were the only ones doing t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00152.html (8,553 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Spam (score: 1): Author: k1ir@designet.com (Jim Idelson); Date: Mon Apr 7 06:39:17 2003; MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.1432.1 I just finished reading a bunch of c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00156.html (7,880 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]