Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QSX\s+frequency\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QSX frequency (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:10:33 -0800
I think the suggestion already made to just say "UP" takes care of this issue without creating the problem I was describing. Agree? Tree _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00578.html (7,236 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSX frequency (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 09:50:13 -0800
There will always be those who call on frequency even when the DX says "up" after every contact, but it should help. I recall one dx station who threw everybody off by specifying "down" (it wasn't in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00582.html (8,164 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSX frequency (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:58:42 -0000
No, as I pointed out 'up' doesn't help the spot grabbers since the software doesn't know what to do and won't set the split, so you still end up with callers on the tx frequency. David Robbins K1TTT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00583.html (9,135 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSX frequency (score: 1)
Author: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 10:02:42 +0200
The best of the best will start to spot the pileup frequency and give the DX's RX QRG in the free text field of the spot. That will mix up the fastest of the fastest ! Have FUN ! FUN seems like an en
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00601.html (8,924 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSX frequency (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 09:15:26 +0100
Or operators setting the split correctly after listening to the frequency? I my understanding they already have to listen before their first transmission simply for confirming the callsign. Happy hol
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00602.html (7,679 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSX frequency (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:48:50 -0000
ah, but that is the basic problem. Many packet ops trust the spot too much, they grab it and start dumping their call in without listening. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: htt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00605.html (8,280 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSX frequency (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 18:43:29 +0100
David Robbins K1TTT schrieb: With this faithful believing I can imagine a sardonic penalty for selfspotters and other wrongdoers when we all will be connected to the central live-logging-server: the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00615.html (8,183 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu