Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RE\:\s+9M0C\s+\&\s+ARRL\s+CWDX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RE\:\s+9M0C\s+\&\s+ARRL\s+CWDX\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RE: 9M0C & ARRL CWDX (score: 1): Author: n7mal@ctaz.com (MAL); Date: Tue Feb 24 20:37:57 1998; There were a lot of negative comments prior to the contest regarding 9M0C not operating in the contest. I worked them on 40 and 80 on Sunday morning. Because of all the negative comments I verified I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00274.html (6,874 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] RE: 9M0C & ARRL CWDX (score: 1): Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough); Date: Tue Feb 24 18:28:09 1998; OK, here's some feedback. I'm really glad that they got on and handed out some QSOs during the contest. Their signal on 160 Saturday morning was the best I had observed during their entire operation; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00276.html (7,737 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]