Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RE\:\s+QSL\/LOTW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RE\:\s+QSL\/LOTW\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RE: QSL/LOTW (score: 1): Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL); Date: Thu Aug 7 22:50:49 2003; Ed N1UR said: """"Its funny that this discussion is happening on the eve before the buro becomes almost obsolete...""""" I don't think LOTW will be any more effective than the present QSL system. I'v; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00164.html (8,149 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] RE: QSL/LOTW (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri Aug 8 07:47:45 2003; Mal, I have to disagree with you on this. The current Beta test is not a fair measure of the response. I'm sure that many people only submitted a small sampling of their data, just to try the process; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00172.html (9,492 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] RE: QSL/LOTW (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Fri Aug 8 16:08:06 2003; "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com> wrote: "The current Beta test is not a fair measure of the response. I'm sure that many people only submitted a small sampling of their data, just to try the proces; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00176.html (7,050 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] RE: QSL/LOTW (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Fri Aug 8 21:15:11 2003; Isn't it just a might early to write off Logbook of the World? We've been waiting for it for years, and now that it's almost here and we can participate in the beta, it's already not effective? One m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00177.html (9,518 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] RE: QSL/LOTW (score: 1): Author: wrt@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Fri Aug 8 22:25:12 2003; _________________________________________________________ I believe I heard that in a pileup the other night. :-) -- 73, Bill W7TI; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00179.html (6,896 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] RE: QSL/LOTW (score: 1): Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL); Date: Sat Aug 9 20:33:35 2003; Ron I'm not writing off LOTW, I'm just a little discouraged by the beta test results. I would really like to see it become a success. The beta test was very well promoted by the ARRL, various mailing; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00184.html (11,130 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]