- 1. [CQ-Contest] RIT offset as QRM clue (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Sun Sep 1 10:31:17 2002
- I've been wondering. When running in contests, I've noticed that sometimes stations answering tend to be .1-.2 kHz higher or lower than my frequency. When this pattern emerges, if I check in the "opp
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00010.html (7,430 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] RIT offset as QRM clue (score: 1)
- Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
- Date: Sun Sep 1 17:47:37 2002
- This has been going on for years and years, and is simply a way some use to "muscle" in on your run frequency. Moving higher will only result in the "grabber" also moving higher, and very soon, you'l
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00012.html (7,726 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] RIT offset as QRM clue (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Sun Sep 1 15:56:55 2002
- Hi Ed -- Oh, sure, I know about the slide in close and squeeze tactic -- I've been in a few frequency fights too. But I was thinking of the more-or-less innocent situation. For example, I'm on 28002
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00013.html (7,795 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] RIT offset as QRM clue (score: 1)
- Author: n2mg@eham.net (Michael Gilmer)
- Date: Sun Sep 1 22:23:03 2002
- I would say that they simply zero beat poorly. If you are running at a good rate, I wouldn't move to accomodate the callers. They seem to be calling just fine, no? Mike N2MG
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00015.html (7,947 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] RIT offset as QRM clue (score: 1)
- Author: ve3iay@rac.ca (Richard Ferch)
- Date: Mon Sep 2 11:43:58 2002
- I know darn well that when I'm S&Ping and the guy I'm trying to work is close to a bigger signal, I'll often lean away from the big signal to improve our chances. I think Pete is just reporting the o
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00018.html (8,169 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu