- 21. Re: [CQ-Contest] RST? (score: 1)
- Author: JOHN GEIGER via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:10:38 -0600
- What problem currently exists with using RST as part of the exchange that we need to fix? I wouldn't define giving everyone a 599 or 59 as a "problem". 73 John AF5CC Sent using {0} I don't think lac
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00121.html (9,896 bytes)
- 22. Re: [CQ-Contest] RST? (score: 1)
- Author: Lee Hiers <lee.hiers@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:10:03 -0500
- Ding-ding-ding! We have a winner! If you want to see some RST silliness (IMO), see N7RR's replacement for RST that he'd like to implement...on his QRZ page. 73 de Lee, AA4GA _________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00122.html (8,463 bytes)
- 23. Re: [CQ-Contest] RST? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:22:12 -0800
- I like TU. It's short and works for CW or SSB. The running station doesn't need it because they will start the QSO with the S&P callsign. CQ Test KK9A KK9A K4SBZ K4SBZ 4 TU 5 K4SBZ TU KK9A QRZ? Too m
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00123.html (10,590 bytes)
- 24. Re: [CQ-Contest] RST? (score: 1)
- Author: K4Sbz Stan <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:16:39 +0000
- Jim, I send TU 5 because, as many have said, just sending a series of 5 dits can be confusing. TU is short and results in fewer repeats. Leaving out a starter can be fine for a leading op with a clea
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00127.html (11,880 bytes)
- 25. Re: [CQ-Contest] RST? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:45:31 -0800
- What contest are you talking about, Stan? The exchange in CQWW is RST <zone>. At 82, my fist has been stinko for years, primarily because I no longer get pleasure from ragchewing. N1MM+ sends all my
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00128.html (9,327 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu