Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RTTY\s+Contest\s+and\s+CW\s+Sprint\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "ku8e" <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:44:35 -0500
Wonderful... another RTTY contest is trashing 40 meters on the CW Sprint weekend. Haven't we been thru this before ? Hey Tree why not move the CW sprint to the 1st weekend in Feb ??? The sponsors of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00149.html (6,621 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:07:57 -0500
Anybody interested in organizing a North American SSTV Sprint? It could be scheduled for WPX Phone weekend. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00150.html (8,507 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis Younker NE6I" <ne6i@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:16:34 -0800
Kind of curious why the vaulted CW mode can't get through RTTY QRM. :) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00151.html (7,960 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:14:07 -0500
There was virtually no rtty activity above 7060 during the sprint. This spectrum was practically unused. (still true on Sunday am) Is there some reason the rtty was shifted to the lower part of the b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00153.html (7,774 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Craig Cook" <craig.n7or@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:54:07 -0800
Ha! If not that, you would expect superior skill coupled with substantial hardware investment to previal. What happeened, did nobody win? :-( -- -- 73, Craig Cook - N7OR in Sandy, OR == "...then that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00154.html (9,537 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:33:43 -0000
Because that is the European bandplan. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net _______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00157.html (10,357 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:13:00 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- RTTY activity is low in the 40 meter band because of international sub-band allocations outside of North America. To the best of my knowledge, CW has no such lim
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00159.html (8,624 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:14:08 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Trash or treasure? All in the point of view.:-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00160.html (8,119 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:23:17 -0700
There was a considerable number of rtty stations on both 7030 and 7040, so a cq near 7060 gave nothing for a reply, there draws the conclusion that with the perception that the band is trashed, there
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00161.html (8,538 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Bob Schreibmaier <k3ph@ptd.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:02:01 -0500
I love CW. It's pretty much the only mode I operate. However... RTTY is entitled to be there, just as much as CW is. Oh yes, 7040 is the international RTTY calling frequency. You would expect there
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00166.html (7,257 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 11 Feb 2007 15:17:29 -0600
That's the phone band in Europe.. I did hear RTTY down to 7025, but even with the Sprint going there was clear space at the bottom of 40 - I never heard any Sprint activity below 7005. The Aves Islan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00167.html (8,678 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:12:06 -0500
Yes, as one of those dastardly RTTY contesters, we have no choice. More importantly, the DX we are trying to work has a lot less choice. For instance JA's are supposed to stay between 7025 and 7030,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00168.html (8,807 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:22:48 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Take it a step further... RTTY is REQUIRED to be there, unlike CW which is allowed anywhere in the band. Between 3 and 30 MHz RTTY is allowed only in the non-pho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00197.html (7,439 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu