Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+40\s+meter\s+operating\s+practices\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+40\s+meter\s+operating\s+practices\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: 40 meter operating practices (score: 1): Author: nt5c@easy.com (John Warren); Date: Mon Nov 3 18:34:24 1997; Doug Smith W9WI/4 replied: Not a problem for CW if the Lower 48 had the same 'phone rights as KL7, KP2/4 and KH6, i.e. 7075-7100. Even 25KHz would be better than zero! And the VEs shouldn't complain; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00041.html (7,354 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: 40 meter operating practices (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale Martin); Date: Tue Nov 4 21:43:58 1997; Isn't there a proposal or something that will be going before the next WRC (99?) that will recommend/propose that the 40m amateur band be extended downward 100kHz to slip us out from under much of th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00069.html (8,187 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]