Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Antennae\s+Advice\s+\-\s+Tribanders\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Antennae\s+Advice\s+\-\s+Tribanders\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: Antennae Advice - Tribanders (score: 1): Author: Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:33:32 -0800 (PST); Welcome! Remember, without guys like you, the big guns have no fun! I'd suggest replacing the Mosely (pre-computer design and traps, if I remember correctly) with either a Force 12 C-3 type (C-3E or; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00714.html (8,638 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: Antennae Advice - Tribanders (score: 1): Author: Dave Lawley <g4buo@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:47:20 +0000; Especially if you can't raise the tower above the present 35ft, why not consider a quad? They work well at relatively low height, and a 2el quad has about the same gain as a 3el yagi (and much more g; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00720.html (7,715 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: Antennae Advice - Tribanders (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:54:47 EST; consider a quad? They work well at relatively low height, and a 2el quad has about the same gain as a 3el yagi (and much more gain than a 3el trapped yagi). There are some downsides to quads. Being 3; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00721.html (7,787 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: Antennae Advice - Tribanders (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:06:10 -0500; Fed on the side for vertical polarization, the quad (or any vertically polarized antenna) loses the "ground gain." On 20 meters over perfect ground: A horizontal dipole at 35' shows 7.33 dBi at a 27; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00722.html (8,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]