- 1. [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ-WPX.scoring etc. (score: 1)
- Author: JEH@on.mobile.telia.se (Jan-Erik Holm)
- Date: Tue Apr 7 11:55:39 1998
- No you havent. You got it 100% correct but a lot of others didnt. de Jim SM2EKM -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.co
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00113.html (7,608 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ-WPX.scoring etc. (score: 1)
- Author: dietz@texas.net (C. Logan Dietz)
- Date: Tue Apr 7 14:59:51 1998
- I like it the way it is now if we are taking a poll. Chuck, KZ5MM -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00126.html (7,079 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ-WPX.scoring etc. (score: 1)
- Author: dietz@texas.net (C. Logan Dietz)
- Date: Wed Apr 8 13:41:09 1998
- Hi Milt, Yes, I like the Stu Perry scoring plan too. Someone needs to start a new contest! Chuck, KZ5MM <snip> -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00139.html (6,616 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu