Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Just\s+say\s+no\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Just\s+say\s+no\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: Just say no (score: 1): Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A); Date: Tue Jun 3 09:33:30 2003; K4OJ wrote: A contester takes on other contesters in the hopes that he is engaging in a fair battle - a level playing field if you will. There are two possible approaches to contesting: Olympian with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00041.html (7,383 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: Just say no (score: 1): Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker); Date: Tue Jun 3 08:56:53 2003; I think this is a pretty silly generalization to make based upon a single individual. Take me as a counter example. I've recently turned 30, but I've been a contester for almost 9 years. I've never d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00048.html (8,418 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re: Just say no (score: 1): Author: jskatz@sk.sympatico.ca (Sylvan Katz); Date: Tue Jun 3 10:53:39 2003; Now this is an interesting generalization! I sure would like to see some evidence for this notion. Intuitively one might expect that the "_vast_majority" are under the age of 50 :-) ... Sylvan Sylva; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00051.html (7,355 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Re: Just say no (score: 1): Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker); Date: Tue Jun 3 11:59:07 2003; Well, it's at least as likely a generalization as saying that because this one young Croatian contester likes packet, all young radio contesters are eagerly embracing packet as a part of contesting.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00052.html (8,344 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Re: Just say no (score: 1): Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com (n4gi@tampabay.rr.com); Date: Tue Jun 3 13:24:41 2003; are over 50 years old.<< Yep, because vast majority of the US hams are over 50. I think the legalization of automatic self-spotting is the only rational answer. Blake N4GI WWYC #36; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00053.html (7,250 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Re: Just say no (score: 1): Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor); Date: Tue Jun 3 21:34:48 2003; Rational? In what way? Seems like what this is saying is that if you have trouble following the rules, we'll just change the rules. Automatic self-spotting is problematic for more than just packet sp; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00060.html (10,258 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Re: Just say no (score: 1): Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed Jun 4 05:07:25 2003; rational answer. I know some more rules we could change for the better!! 1. No power limits--qrp vs hp--same catagory 2. No more m/m--everyone for himself 3. Do away with 10 mimute band change 4. Don; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00061.html (7,702 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Re: Just say no (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@quadnet.net (Bob Wanderer); Date: Fri Jun 6 21:06:29 2003; Rational? In what way? Seems like what this is saying is that if you have trouble following the rules, we'll just change the rules. <snip> But in America, if you do it wrong enough it becomes accepta; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00102.html (7,174 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]