Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+M\/Ms\s+Annoying\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+M\/Ms\s+Annoying\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: M/Ms Annoying? (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:15:30 +0000; 2 points: 1. If you are unwilling to post a call, then don't critizize them. IF you want to take action, the FCC is well set up for that. And of course, there's recourse to the sponsor. And this doe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00357.html (9,320 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: M/Ms Annoying? (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:40:57 -0800; Ed, that is not correct. I think you are mixing up LSB and USB. A USB signal with the suppressed carrier at 21200.5 KHz would be legal so long as the opposite sideband rejection of the stations trans; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00376.html (10,778 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: M/Ms Annoying? (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 28 Oct 2003 08:47:11 -0600; I agree, but I have received an OO notice (I'm sure other list members have as well) for operating USB below 14153. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com -- The wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00382.html (9,647 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: M/Ms Annoying? (score: 1): Author: "Bernie McClenny, W3UR" <bernie@dailydx.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:54:06 -0000; I would send the OO his/her notice back explaining to him/her their mistake and send a copy to the person who appointed them as an OO! Bernie, W3UR -- Bernie McClenny, W3UR Editor of The Daily DX, Th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00393.html (11,075 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]