Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Realtime\s+Scoreboard\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Realtime Scoreboard (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 06:36:15 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I have no issue with Rick's "call to arms" for the M/M category. In fact, I think anyone running assisted should use Gerry's excellent site (nice work OM). Personally, I don't use Gerry's site for a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00309.html (9,000 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Realtime Scoreboard (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 03:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
-- Original Message -- - To me, unassisted is just that. While I can totally see the difference between clicking on spots and hitting "Enter" vs observing the total score tally, I still consider it a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00337.html (7,951 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Realtime Scoreboard (score: 1)
Author: "Vitor Luis Aidar dos Santos, PY2NY" <py2ny@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:58:45 -0300
I use realtime scoreboard, but not showing all the info... only total number of QSOs, etc... not band by band.... We could sugest W1VE to allow only this kind of info at livescores... PY2NY -- Origin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00374.html (11,328 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Realtime Scoreboard (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 08:56:50 -0500
Ed, Luis, Ev et Al... There is lots of lively debate on this subject. It seems the hot spot of contention is Single-Operator, Unassisted operation. I do not believe any of us who are pushing the conc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00385.html (14,345 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu