Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s+Base\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:02:30 -0000
Saturday a friend of mine gave out some points in NAQP. He was in a state different from the transmitter location. He was on an internet remote base. What should he have used for his state? I read an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00347.html (6,664 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Thorne" <rmthorne@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 10:47:50 -0500
He should give the state from which the transmitter is located. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00348.html (8,447 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:10:35 -0500
The rules say 'station location' which suggests to me that the station is where the operator is sitting. Be that as it may, given that the rules are silent on the issue, as long as he chooses one and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00349.html (8,836 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:26:08 -0700
The location of the transmitter. This will be addressed in 2006 revised rules. 73 de Bruce, WA7BNM (bhorn@hornucopia.com) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00350.html (7,768 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 10:49:40 -0700
I would guess that what counts is where the antennas are located, but there may not be a rule for this yet. Mike, W4EF.................. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00352.html (7,813 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "SGT Korey Chandler" <korey.chandler@us.army.mil>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:57:05 -0000
Using the remote base is like using a very long microphone cord. He should have identified that he was using a remote base and give the state in which it was located. 73, Korey YI9VCQ/KA5VCQ ________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00353.html (8,376 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:07:08 EDT
The location of the transmitter. This will be addressed in 2006 revised rules. 73 de Bruce, WA7BNM (_bhorn@hornucopia.com_ (mailto:bhorn@hornucopia.com) ) The logical answer as I see it. This might m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00355.html (7,638 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:15:40 -0500
If it's to be the transmitter location, then perhaps in SS I should be VE4XT/KP4, without all that nasty travel and stuff. Rare-ish prefix to gain attention and booming propagation to reel 'em in. Be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00357.html (10,329 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:54:18 -0000
Bruce might I suggest you think this through before you make such a hasty response. I refer you to VE4XT's response where he asks a valid question: Why go to a rare mult when you can do from at home.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00358.html (9,667 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Thorne" <rmthorne@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 15:47:00 -0500
A new category or making remote stations qso's checklogs only is not the answer. Mater of fact no answer is needed, at best I would guess a little clarification is needed. I run my remote hf station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00359.html (13,718 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 15:03:35 -0700
My response was in two parts. 1) regarding N7MAL's question of what QTH the contester using the remote base should have sent - the QTH of the transmitter (remote base). I believe that is consistent w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00360.html (9,144 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <W5OV@W5OV.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:11:01 -0500
What Bruce says is correct. On what basis are you challenging his statement? Contest rules do not allow for remote receiver sites. ARRL: All transmitters and receivers must be located within a 500-me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00361.html (10,973 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Putnam" <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:28:19 -0600
It seems to me that this is very neatly addressed in the FCC rules. Station location is where the rf will be or is being radiated from, not from where the studio or mic or control location might be l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00362.html (10,125 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <W5OV@W5OV.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:19:30 -0500
Bruce, I would suggest that the NAQP consider adding a reference to the ARRL General Rules as applying to NAQP as well. Several potential loopholes might be closed just by doing that. 73, Bob W5OV My
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00363.html (9,579 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:53:11 -0500
We're starting to see bogeymen around every corner again... Most contests specify that all transmitters and receivers must be contained within some geography, usually 500 meters or 1,000 feet. The ru
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00365.html (12,035 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 04:41:35 -0000
For many years now I have been amazed at the way a subject, any subject, can get so twisted that it loses its original meaning. Bob I'm not picking on you but you said:""I felt that the comments were
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00366.html (12,827 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Cooper, Stewart" <coopers@odl.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:47:43 +0100
Right. It's where the RF comes from that defines the station 'location', not where the op is sitting! It seems to me that this is very neatly addressed in the FCC rules. Station location is where the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00368.html (11,050 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <W5OV@W5OV.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 06:15:40 -0500
OK Mal, I see you added the reflector back into this discussion. That's fine. Your non-NAQP point about W6RJ is what seemed to open the door to a more generalized discussion since he was not in the N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00370.html (14,497 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:07:26 -0000
My opinion is that remote base operators should be given bonus points to offset the difficulties in operating where you can't actually touch the equipment. The technical challenges and overcoming the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00371.html (15,394 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Thorne" <rmthorne@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:16:00 -0500
Hi Mal: In your email you state "That gives him an unfair, very unfair, advantage over everyone else." I'm glad you mentioned this and I'm not picking on you. But this seems to be the common thread I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00372.html (15,826 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu