Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Restructuring\s+of\s+Ontario\s+into\s+four\s+Sections\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Restructuring\s+of\s+Ontario\s+into\s+four\s+Sections\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Restructuring of Ontario into four Sections (score: 1): Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:30:33 -0500; For further details on restructuring of Ontario into four sections, see the "real scoop", "unvarnished poop" on the Radio Amateurs of Canada web site at http://www.rac.ca/en/news/stories/2012/2012021; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00116.html (10,927 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Restructuring of Ontario into four Sections (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:35:15 -0500; Well, if we end up with ON (for Ontario North), it will be easy for ME - no change required :-) At a guess, there is active contesters in all sections - just not very many in Ontario North. VE3TU and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00122.html (12,997 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]