Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Reverse\s+Beacon\s+Network\s+Stats\s+from\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Reverse\s+Beacon\s+Network\s+Stats\s+from\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network Stats from ARRL DX CW (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:27:58 -0500; Thanks to N6TV, the stats from last weekend are now on the RBN blog at <http://reversebeacon.blogspot.com/2012/02/arrl-dx-cw-stats-thanks-n6tv.html> -- 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Databas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00207.html (7,074 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network Stats from ARRL DX CW (score: 1): Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:27:07 -0200; Thanks for the info, very interesting. I was looking for RBN spots while operating and noticed that other station in LU and PY had more spots that us. We use RIT to catch callers, so our TX frequency; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00209.html (9,512 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network Stats from ARRL DX CW (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:21:02 -0500; I'm afraid that doesn't explain it, Jorge. As I understand it, a station must QSY ~500 Hz before he is recognized as a "new CQer", and then only if his transmission contains the keywords CQ or TEST a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00212.html (9,989 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]