Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Rookie\s+Roundup\s+Scoring\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:42:10 -0600
Just to clear up a couple of misconceptions - it will not be necessary for a QSO to be submitted instantly for it to be validated by the software. I can't speak exactly as to the details, but the gen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00106.html (7,971 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:12:25 -0600
That I can also live with, BUT One more question,, what happen to all the QSO's that are the equivalent of random QSO's that happen on any other contest where the other station is NOT in the test, an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00122.html (9,198 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:36:16 -0500
10 minutes after the end of the contest? Isn't that cutting it just a little tight? Especially for a contest designed for Rookie contesters and operators? Just to clear up a couple of misconceptions
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00124.html (8,950 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:49:18 -0600
For the first couple of runs, the cutoff time will likely be "flexible", but the point is to be prompt. How flexible will be determined by the contest admin at HQ and the server gurus. Before we get
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00128.html (10,560 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: K4RO Kirk Pickering <k4ro.tcg@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:50:43 -0600
Hey folks, before we get too far along, can we all stop and notice that the ARRL IS SPONSORING A CONTEST FOR NEWCOMERS! Remember all of those discussions about how badly we need new blood in contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00131.html (8,078 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:05:22 -0500
What a poor idea this is guys. Not that of a rookie contest, that is noble. But to have a rookie contest that is so diconnected from normal contesting is illogical. Imagine a rookie comes over to a v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00144.html (8,606 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:26:14 -0600
I know (or at least I have been informed) that people from CQ monitor this board. but does the heads of ARRL contesting do it too? and what are their thoughts on all these comments? Joe WB9SBD *The O
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00146.html (9,861 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:22:28 -0600
I needed to check with The Boss, KX9X, to be sure this is correct. The policy for all ARRL contests is that contacts with unique call signs or with stations that make contacts, but don't submit them,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00147.html (10,898 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: "Craig D. Smith" <craig@powersmith.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:39:43 -0700
I think this is a wonderful idea and believe that the ARRL deserves a giant pat on the back for having the courage to attempt something this divergent from our normal way of running contests. My sing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00152.html (9,652 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu