Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Run\s+vs\s+S\&P\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Run\s+vs\s+S\&P\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Run vs S&P (score: 1): Author: KH6DV@cs.com; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 09:58:49 EST; Why do we need "special incentive" for those who S&P vs Running? The choice between the two is a tactical one. You Run when you can, when rate is obtainable, otherwise you S&P because either rate isn; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00033.html (10,347 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Run vs S&P (score: 1): Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:08:57 -0500; A very good point was made about Run frequencies not being relinquished when a station moves to S&P. SO2R is one example, and now many MM stations are utilizing a 2nd station on a band for S&P operat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00038.html (7,937 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Run vs S&P (score: 1): Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 12:23:40 -0800; I agree with KH6DV. If EVERYONE had to S&P then who would work who? Everyone would just be tuning around but no one would be calling CQ Contest so who would you work? I am just a little pistol statio; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00057.html (9,449 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Run vs S&P (score: 1): Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 12:29:39 -0800; This is a very good question. I personally heard a Big Gun station doing a run on the low end of the band constantly calling CQ Contest. Farther down the band was the same call trying to bust a pileu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00058.html (8,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]