Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+\"Time\s+Element\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+\"Time\s+Element\"\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SO2R "Time Element" (score: 1): Author: kq2m@mags.net (Robert Shohet); Date: Tue Jun 6 11:40:18 2000; This SO2R "Time Element advantage" is NONSENSE! Bill if you are concerned about a "Time Advantage" that some stations have over others then why aren't you concerned about differences in antennas? I c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00143.html (10,772 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] SO2R "Time Element" (score: 1): Author: w7ti@jps.net (Bill Turner); Date: Tue Jun 6 13:50:20 2000; _________________________________________________________ I realize what you say about antenna differences is exactly right. And I have done the comparison you suggest: In my Seattle QTH I had a 4-el; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00148.html (7,806 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]