- 1. [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the SS (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 14:26:02 -0800
- This weekend I worked in the SS a few stations that I assumed were ronning SO2R. They called CQ. I answered - no reply. I called again - no reply. Just as I was gong to move the VFO, they came back.
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00063.html (7,266 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the SS (score: 1)
- Author: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 03:34:52 +0000
- I also noticed this on a couple of M stations. Likely they had another radio w/op running while they scouted for Qs. I erased a couple before they came back and had to scramble when they started thei
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00070.html (9,335 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the SS (score: 1)
- Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 13:30:10 +0000
- I did most of my operating in S&P mode.. for me.. the number of Qs made an impact. Many many times, I would come across a station calling CQ... loud and fast... checked the section, IF I needed it, I
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00080.html (9,830 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the SS (score: 1)
- Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 07:43:41 -0600
- Cluster Pileup, Even when I ran as one of the W1AW portable stations, I did not remember the frequency ( pun intended ) of click and pounce Op's. But in SS this weekend was my first real experience
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00081.html (10,964 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the SS (score: 1)
- Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:15:16 +0000 (UTC)
- It is very easy to see who was doing alternating CQs on two bands if you look them up on the reversebeacon spot analysis tool. Because of the slow rate in SS everyone sends lots of CQs and there seem
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00085.html (10,607 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu