Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2T\s+vs\.\s+SO1T\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2T\s+vs\.\s+SO1T\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2T vs. SO1T (score: 1): Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 00:36:50 -0700; I've been hearing such a just lot lately about how two tower stations have such a big advantage over single tower stations that I just had to speak up on the subject. Please try to follow me in the d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00579.html (8,901 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2T vs. SO1T (score: 1): Author: "Guy Molinari" <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:01:45 +0000; I agree. You forgot about the SO2V capability in N1MM. That should comprise a separate category as well. Or how about people with dual receive capability? Maybe these could be combined into one. ;-); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00595.html (10,890 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]