- 1. [CQ-Contest] SO3R??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Hanlon, Steve" <SHanlon@dnr.state.md.us>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:57:16 -0400
- and then what, you pull a rabbit out of your hat? i would like to see someone use 3 radios in a meaningful way. i don't see how you can actively use them. if the 1st radio is calling CQ and you are
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00205.html (9,159 bytes)
- 2. RE: [CQ-Contest] SO3R??? (score: 1)
- Author: CT1BOH - José Carlos Cardoso Nunes <ct1boh@sapo.pt>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:42:07 +0100
- There are several ways to explore SO3R: Here is one than can be done from Aruba @P40E: Radio 1: I'am running on 20 (during night time) beaming USA and EU Radio 2: S&P on 15 on a very quiet band beami
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00206.html (10,994 bytes)
- 3. RE: [CQ-Contest] SO3R??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Hanlon, Steve" <SHanlon@dnr.state.md.us>
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 07:33:23 -0400
- i understand having a receiver that you have on in the background, that's not SO3R - that's just having a receiver making noise. SOXR means actively using the radios. Running on #1, S&P on #2, and ho
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00211.html (10,471 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO3R??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 06:38:47 -0500
- Just goes to show there's no better way to encourage innovation than by telling someone it can't be done... 73, kelly ve4xt -- Original Message -- From: "CT1BOH - José Carlos Cardoso Nunes" <c
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00214.html (12,905 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO3R??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:49:31 +0300
- Very nice description, Jose! Exactly Alternate CQs is one good example of SO3R. Effectively I have been doing SO3R when CQing on 40m and listening my frequency and up. At the same time S&P on 80 or 2
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00221.html (13,651 bytes)
- 6. RE: [CQ-Contest] SO3R??? (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
- Date: 08 Apr 2004 11:56:34 -0500
- freq and then 10 up heard the same guy trying to bust a pileup. stations are replying to the CQ and get no answer because the guy is up 10 on the 2nd radio in the pileup. I would suggest that's a rat
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00224.html (10,897 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO3R??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:02:55 -0500
- I think this is not terribly uncommon amongst serious single-banders and during single-band contests such as the ARRL 10 Meter Contest. I've done it (once, poorly) with a setup (at K5TR) that involve
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00225.html (10,248 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO3R??? (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
- Date: 09 Apr 2004 00:02:09 -0500
- Is that really much different from using the other VFO to make a quick multiplier hunt between fruitless CQs? I guess I figured "SO2R" meant the ability to listen on one radio *while transmitting* on
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00233.html (10,162 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO3R??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 07:45:42 -0500
- Actually, yes, what I did above could be done with just a single Yaesu FT-1000MP with dual simultaneous receive. -- (Note: I have changed my primary personal email account. Please replace your addres
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00234.html (10,585 bytes)
- 10. [CQ-Contest] SO3R??? (score: 1)
- Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:39:06 -0400
- On two stations on the same band at the same time, or same subband, many of us do this every year in FD with a station on CW, another on SSB, and sometimes a third one on RTTY/digital. There is some
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00245.html (10,932 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu