Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+CW\s+question\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:16:43 -0800
At least one popular logging application has a facility to load last years log in order to auto-populate the PREC, CK, and SEC exchange elements. If your skill level requires you to use such crutches
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00101.html (9,500 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:27:35 -0600
The rules don't specify for the check the year you were first licensed as a WHAT. I suppose I could legally use the year I was first licensed as a Novice, as a General, as an Extra, or maybe even the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00104.html (11,955 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Lindquist, WW3DE" <ww3de@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:14:09 -0500
Huh??? Waste of time? Sending the other station's call sign has been a part of the SS exchange for as long as I can recall - going back some 30 years since SS became a "must" event for me - no matte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00106.html (15,007 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:16:33 -0700
Hans: That is why I came back after I worked you S&P and I asked you to resend your 'check' Hans. I know that you are the 'enforcer' of the selectable CK's and I wanted to be sure I had not accidentl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00108.html (10,060 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:33:43 -0500
Aw, c'mon Zack. "First licensed" means first licensed, period. It's bad enough we have people picking random numbers because they can get away with it. Let's not muddy the waters further. 73 The rule
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00109.html (13,057 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 23:21:34 -0500 (EST)
Hans; I respectfully disagree with you here. I do user a Call History data base which auto populates, for example, the Check and Section field in SS. However, I ALWAYS copy every exchange that is sen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00112.html (9,122 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 03:47:48 -0600
For the proficient CW ops amongst us bumping up the speed of your callsign may not be an issue. For someone like myself, that bump of 8 WPM when you're already at my brain processing limit of about 2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00115.html (12,624 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 03:57:43 -0600
As I read the rule: 4.4.1. The last 2 digits of the year of first license for either the operator or the station. it seems rather clear to me that if I am operating my own station then it is the year
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00116.html (10,453 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 05:12:27 -0500
Some of us manage to use the databases and still catch changes when they come in, even from the folks who work so hard to trip us up. Since there's nothing to be gained from changing your check every
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00117.html (13,965 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:15:52 -0700
I respectfully disagree. IMHO, here is a perfectly acceptable SS QSO: CQ SS CQ SS WW3DE SS N2IC N2IC 321 B WW3DE 70 DE TU 456 B N2IC 68 NM TU WW3DE SS 73, Steve, N2IC ________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00120.html (10,244 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:38:04 -0500
The rules state that , the callsign is part of the exchange. If you dont send the way the rules state , then you should be disqualified... Play by the rules !! Glenn VA3DX ___________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00124.html (10,293 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 04:45:18 -0800 (PST)
Don't send "CK" before the actual number, we all know what that number is and it breaks up the exchange rhythm. I like to repeat the serial number the other guy sent IF we've been struggling with it.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00126.html (17,566 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:55:11 -0600
For me it does. I personally like a minimum of accoutrements when operating SS. I use a computer logging program but I send my CW with a keyer. I copy the Morse with my own ears. I do not use Super C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00129.html (11,230 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:15:11 -0600
Yes that is one thing I can not even begin to understand how anyone may not be able to remember what their real CK would be. Or maybe just that this hobby means a lot more to me? For I can really rem
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00131.html (11,766 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:27:15 -0600
For me it's a similar situation, Not that I can not copy it, if the whole exchange is sent at 40 wpm, i'm Ok, but my brain has a rhythm thing, Maybe it's part of the processor between my ears filteri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00133.html (10,435 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:31:54 -0500
Hi all, May I respectfully suggest checking the archives on this one? Zack is right: even as quoted by Nate, the rule doesn't even specify amateur licence. However, if you check the archives, the rul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00134.html (11,873 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Lindquist, WW3DE" <ww3de@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:57:10 -0500
Sorry, Steve. I misread the intent of your comment. The station replying should send the call sign of the other station, of course, but the station answering is, indeed, under no specific obligation
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00136.html (11,793 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:47:24 EST
Right on, Barry! I also hate it when the replying station does not send my call at the beginning. How am I to know if he is sending the report to me or to someone else?....duh. 73, Geo... George Wagn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00141.html (8,544 bytes)

39. [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:08:55 -0500
I thought Hans was talking about sending the *QSO number* from last year, not the CK. Jim Cain At The K1TN Superstation Atlantic City -- your 'check' Hans. I know that you are the 'enforcer' of the s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00142.html (8,609 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Andrew <ac6wi@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:28:18 -0500
Hmm, this raises an interesting question for me..... I've never participated in Sweepstakes, but if I decided to give out a few points, would I use the year I was first licensed in the UK (1991) or t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00143.html (14,134 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu