- 41. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
- Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:21:12 EST
- You can view "year first licensed" sort of like "year first born". You wouldn't ask "first born as what?" That would be ridiculous, so why ask "first licensed as what...novice, general...etc?" FWIW..
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00147.html (12,666 bytes)
- 42. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
- Author: k2qmf@juno.com
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:21:05 -0500
- You Gotta be kidding.... Do you think it really matters????? ____________________________________________________________ Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance If you owe under $729k you probably quali
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00159.html (14,676 bytes)
- 43. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
- Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:02:30 -0500
- This topic, as well as some others, would never come up again if contest sponsors themselves would simply follow up rules. What we actually have by now? - SS. The year of the first license as a part
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00167.html (14,285 bytes)
- 44. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
- Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:20:03 -0700
- Do the guys who object to the arbitrary selection of a check year in the SS exchange also object to the universal practice of arbitrarily sending '599' instead of a *real* signal report? Al W6LX ____
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00176.html (9,675 bytes)
- 45. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
- Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@fidmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:51:48 -0600
- How do you know that 599 isn't a real signal report? 73s John AA5JG _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00178.html (10,019 bytes)
- 46. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
- Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:24:44 -0500
- The ARRL recognizes its rule is ambiguous but also recognizes that it simply doesn't matter. It matters not one whit if the check is legitimate or made up: unlike a radiogram, an exchange is not abou
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00186.html (16,766 bytes)
- 47. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
- Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:07:51 -0600
- he he he yeah in ss you got to be 599 just to be heard at all! he he he I guess the 5 could be a different number because of the qrm... Joe WB9SBD The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00190.html (10,690 bytes)
- 48. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
- Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@fidmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:01:58 -0600
- But if it doesn't matter, and can't be enforced, why put it in the rules? Why not have the rules state: "The check is any 2 digit number the operator chooses, which must stay consistent throughout th
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00191.html (18,604 bytes)
- 49. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
- Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:04:26 -0600
- no just the first place winners. K9ABC looks like he is in first place. but his CK is wrong he sent 55 when it 82, too bad, who's in second place/ W9xyz he sent 37 and it is correct. he wins first pl
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00192.html (16,611 bytes)
- 50. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
- Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:47:11 -0700
- How would anyone ever research that I was WN2ICU, and got my first license in 1968 ? Please, can you folks please get a life and do something productive - like prepare your stations for Phone SS and
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00193.html (17,882 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu