Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+SSB\s+And\s+Your\s+Callsign\s+In\s+The\s+Exchange\s*$/: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:33:40 -0500
I did, but I'll respond direct too. To not have the Cabrillo file include the double exchange is probably giving some people heartburn, since now we'll probably discuss how only hand written paper lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00302.html (12,963 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Grant" <dougk1dg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:47:15 +0000
I call foul! Tom is using this list to subliminally promote his callsign, always asking "WHY?". Besides, it is DURING the CQWW that I hear 'WHY send 59903 and DURING the SS I hear 'WHY send stuff tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00304.html (9,353 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: W6SX Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:14:34 -0800
The answer is easy. If the other guy not sending his call upsets your sense of propriety, ask for his call. If enough people ask, it will slow him down enough that any advantage will vanish. Same fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00306.html (10,988 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:45:11 -0500
So, let me get this straight, David. You're saying that because the Cabrillo file format for SS doesn't sequence the log information in the same exact order it's sent, we can therefore ignore SS rule
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00311.html (14,476 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:59:26 -0500
I for one don't have a problem with this. If you disagree with the exchange or the rigid format the exchange is supposed to be sent in, then take it up with the League and argue your point. And pleas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00313.html (13,422 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:09:32 -0800
OK. I just reviewed it, and it looks fine. Check with us again in 75 years, or whenever you're eligible to play in this contest, whichever is sooner. 73, de Hans, K0HB ______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00314.html (11,191 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:23:40 -0500
-- No Ron, I didn't say that at all. First I said no one is disputing the rules are the rules. Where you and some others made the leap from a discussion on the topic to assuming we feel empowered we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00315.html (15,560 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Ken Adams <kfiveka@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:44:01 -0600
Well, this is quite a lively discussion. This was the 75th running of a domestic contest steeped in tradition. I like tradition. We had very high scores this year and participation appears to be up.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00316.html (8,815 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:11:04 +0100
Hi Paul, What I donīt understand. Why do you always question the rules of a contest, especially if you donīt even participate? You want the report taken away from the WPX exchange and here the callsi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00320.html (10,661 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:25:44 -0600 (CST)
It doesn't much matter. You always win that one anyway! 73, Zack W9SZ "One man's mead is another man's Poisson." _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00324.html (9,545 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:32:37 -0800
<snip> It's good to feel "wanted" :-) I am eligible now to play in SS, as is any non-W/VE citizen who has a CEPT licence. My interest in SS was sparked by adding support for it in a contest logger. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00325.html (11,116 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:32:44 -0800
"Ward Silver" replied When posting to cq-contest, I try to be precise, and careful in my choice of words, so that readers will focus on the point I'm trying to make rather than trivia. I've checked t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00326.html (10,691 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:01:04 -0500
Even though I think the doubled portion of the exchange is pretty odd, and a method of "cheating" is readily available by simply looking at the logged callsign, there is another matter here. If the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00330.html (10,601 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:07:05 -0600
There is no requirement to exchange the callsign twice! There is no odd "double portion" of the exchange! Where did you get the idea of someone getting DQ'ed for it? Sheesh. We need some reality here
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00338.html (12,711 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:39:35 -0600
You left off the part of the definition that says "to equalize the chances of the competitors". Using your partial definition then those with long calls are handicapped in ALL contests. But in your d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00339.html (11,152 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:28:54 -0800
That's why you're such a good programmer :-) Your definition is incomplete. Handicaps are applied unequally to all competitors with the goal of producing an equalized competitive environment. Requir
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00342.html (11,052 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:54:23 -0500
What a spirited discussion! Its clear that SS is a different kind of contest, just as a Drag race is different than a Road Rally is different than a race like the Indy 500. It's also clear that the s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00349.html (10,350 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:02:16 -0500
You are? From Ireland? This I've got to see... <snip> It's good to feel "wanted" :-) I am eligible now to play in SS, as is any non-W/VE citizen who has a CEPT licence. My interest in SS was sparked
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00350.html (11,672 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:08:20 -0500
As I understand the controversy, using your scenario below, the exchange would be : N3LI: W5OV 123 Alpha 99 EPA (or is it WPA?) and that, in my mind, is clearly against the rules.... ________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00351.html (10,025 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Mike Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:37:39 -0500
Some folk have said that they NIL other Ops who don't send their callsign as part of the exchange. That is in addition to the callsign in the log. Not me. I support changing the exchange to obviate t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00354.html (9,500 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu