Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+beefs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+beefs\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS beefs (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <mark@concertart.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:20:33 -0600; My mom raised me so when there was something wrong with the system I should change it. Usually that just gets me into trouble, but I have to do it, because I spend my life trying to please my mom (ps; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00024.html (10,576 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:41:45 -0600 (CST); I also see no need for leading zero's. I never sent them. As far as people using them, maybe it's a matter of experience. If enough people copy enough people not using them, it will catch on. Maybe O; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00043.html (12,060 bytes)
3. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs (score: 1): Author: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 07:28:49 -0500; I found "PWR?" worked as well as "PREC?" in getting fills during the SS CW contest. -- Eric K3NA [...snip...] 3. What on earth can we do to make "PREC?" easier for more people to understand? If I sho; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00046.html (9,356 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs (score: 1): Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:16:32 -0500; I just ask P? and only get a 50% responce. If you sent me PREC? I probably would have replied with ? becuase to me the exchange is "NR P CL CK SEC" so if I need a fill, that's what I ask for. 73 de; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00048.html (11,214 bytes)
5. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs (score: 1): Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:17:54 -0500; Yes, "Precedence" is a totally bizarre word anyway. I was guilty of sending CK several times. "PWR?" was immediately obvious. George W1EBI I found "PWR?" worked as well as "PREC?" in getting fills du; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00049.html (10,234 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <mark@concertart.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:32:01 -0600; I, to, always used to say "pwr?" and that worked fine when the precedence was only a function of power (in the GOOD OLD DAYS). However, this weekend I had such mixed results early on, because I think; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00050.html (9,366 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:03:04 +0000; Hi All: No, let's not make it part of the number. 46B versus 466?!?!? I used to use "pwr?" as well, but switched to "prec?". Hmmm... that IS what it's called guys. I kinda like "Q?" If you can't hear; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00052.html (10,326 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:05:26 EST; Hmmmmm... That implies that PWR also means: PWR = School PWR = Unlimited PWR = Multiop Guess I can live with the social implications of that. Why not just just use what I use in the ARRL DX Contest,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00053.html (8,447 bytes)
9. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs (score: 1): Author: "Macie, Gordon" <GMacie@innotrac.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:00:52 -0500; One way I had was to repeat the number/precedence with a question mark. If I copied "845 B" but wasn't sure about the "B", I'd send "845B?" and if either part was wrong, he'd let me know. It's just a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00054.html (8,869 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs (score: 1): Author: "Warren C. Stankiewicz" <nf1j@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:59:34 -0800; And yet, I found that when I edited the exchange string to put a space between the number and the precedence, (such as "45 Q" rather than "45Q"), I got a lot less requests for repeats and fills. warr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00058.html (9,144 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs (score: 1): Author: Gerry Hull <windev@inetmarket.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 16:31:00 -0500; Hey Mark, There's a funny thing about low numbers... You get repeat requests on them... This year, I started SS 4 hours late, at 8pm est... So, when I was at #1, many asked for repeats of my numbers; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00061.html (11,463 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]