- 1. [CQ-Contest] SS tempest in an out-of-state teapot (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:21:22 -0500
- While it has been enlightening and to a degree entertaining to hear the discourse and various "takes" on changes related to SS Sunday afternoons, I hope that everyone understands that none of this di
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00239.html (8,041 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS tempest in an out-of-state teapot (score: 1)
- Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:24:12 -0700
- There is no reason to bring in the ARRL people as we have not really come up with anything substantial other than attempting to shave some time off the contest which there is not even an agreement on
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00241.html (10,028 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS tempest in an out-of-state teapot (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Lindquist, WW1ME" <ww1me@roadrunner.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:24:23 -0500
- Guy, the CQ-Contest reflector is not "essentially missing the ARRL players needed for change." This is far from a "contained discussion." What contesters post here does get read by the ARRL movers an
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00249.html (9,859 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu