Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SSB\s+Sprint\s+75m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SSB\s+Sprint\s+75m\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SSB Sprint 75m (score: 1): Author: K5NZ@aol.com; Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:03:39 EST; I got on for a few minutes to help out Sat.. I have to ask, why in the world don't all the SSB Sprinters agree to use some of this wonderful pig farmer free area 3600-3790... Pick like 3600-3675 nada; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00189.html (6,979 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] SSB Sprint 75m (score: 1): Author: Bill and Cindy <wb0o@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:25:49 -0800 (PST); An excellent point is made here. I suspect the main reason there has not been a shift to 3.600-3.675 for the SSB Sprint is that this is an Extra-class only segment, and would exclude some potential o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00200.html (7,373 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]