Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SWL\s+QSL\s+cards\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SWL\s+QSL\s+cards\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:30:34 -0700; I have a stupid question I have gotten SWL QSL cards before, but honestly, just tossed them. I got one in today from Austria with a nice letter and so on. I want to send him a card. What do you put f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00166.html (7,074 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: "WT2P - C. 'Fred' Johnson" <fredwt2p@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:06:23 -0500; I normally reply with the same info they have on the card.. Most SWL'ers will say who I was talking to (in the rare event I was CQ'ing) - which makes it easier to 'check' that I was on the air at the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00168.html (8,179 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: Dennis Vernacchia <n6ki73@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:09:56 -0800; You could also write This QSL card Confirms your reception of my QSO with ( station you wer working at time ) and all the rest of the data above No signal reports needed, and be sure to indicate your; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00169.html (9,352 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:16:42 EST; I fill in the usual info - date, time, frequency, and his SWL "call". I draw a line through the RST field, since I have no idea how strong he was :>) I also cross out the "2-way QSO" words in the usu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00170.html (8,362 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:30:46 -0700; Hi Jerry, I usually put the information of the Qso in progress at that time noted on the card... some countries used to have a requirement that the applicant for a license provide a set number of SWL; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00171.html (9,522 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:38:26 -0600; For what its worth, if anything, once upon a time (Don't know if it still is) there were a few countries that required an applicant for an amateur radio license to submit "proof" of having prior "rad; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00172.html (10,081 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:42:52 -0600; Instead of "Confirming QSO with ...", I put "To (SWL number) confirming reception of QSO of W9SZ with (other station callsign) on (Date, time etc.) 73, Zack W9SZ _____________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00173.html (8,835 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:54:31 -0500; Hi John, SHAME ON YOU for simply tossing away those SWL cards like that...! Seriously!!! Did you ever consider the fact that such actions could very well have "turned-off" more than one budding wanna; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00174.html (9,624 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: LY8O <ly8o@ot.lt>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:12:45 +0200; Hello John, Usually I am filling a QSL card for SWL station as a regular QSL card and the only difference is I am printing "SWL" in report window/line instead of 59 or 579. As a former SWL long time; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00176.html (8,212 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:26:12 -0500; I get tons of SWL cards via the bureau, sometimes 5-10 a month. Sometimes I get them via email too. My qsl card has two check boxes, one that says "our qso" and another that says "your report." I che; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00183.html (9,223 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: Ahokas Kari <kari.ahokas@turku.fi>; Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:41:46 +0200; Ryan, What do you do to get TONS of swl cards? Tons is not the same as 5-10 a month I get dozens, and every single of them will be answered in due course. No problems with what to write on the card,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00185.html (10,355 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:50:38 -0500; "Tons" of SWL cards is all relative. :) IOW, I don't expect that there are lots of SWLs anymore, so 5-10 cards per month is plenty! Ryan, N2RJ -- Ryan A. Jairam, _____________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00189.html (11,649 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: "John" <shore1@xplornet.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:06:01 -0800; Ryan, before you make that a foregone conclusion, consider this: there are hams that are also SWL's..... there are SWL's that are hams...... so before making this conclusion... please take this into; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00191.html (13,116 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:16:23 -0500; Hi John, Yes, I have taken that into account. But I've been an SWL for over 20 years myself and the SWL hobby is definitely on the decline. Ryan, N2RJ -- Ryan A. Jairam, _____________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00193.html (14,069 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:53:11 -0500; "...But I've been an SWL for over 20 years myself and the SWL hobby is definitely on the decline..." ** It's no wonder the hobby is on the decline... I was shocked upon my return to casual SWL'ing la; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00199.html (9,148 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:50:31 -0600; I still do quite a bit of SWL'ing. I also like to listen for UTE and spy numbers stations. I have also noticed the absence of some stations that I heard all over the band in the late 60's. I can unde; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00203.html (10,875 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] SWL QSL cards (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:59:12 -0500; Oh yeah. There will never be another Eddie Startz but I wonder if the Happy Station Program is being carried on? Or is that gone now, too? 73, Zack W9SZ ______________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00226.html (13,057 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]