Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Self\-Spotting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Self\-Spotting\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: eu1sa@belsonet.net (Vladimir V. Sidorov); Date: Sat May 31 17:41:08 2003; Gents, There were a lot of suggestions how to settle the self-spotting problem. Some of them require quite complicated actions to be taken. Though there is a very simple solution. OK, the K1TTT obser; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00343.html (8,741 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: tavan@tibco.com (Rick Tavan); Date: Sat May 31 14:46:47 2003; Although I believe Walt is incorrect about the rules (Many contests do explicitly prohibit self-spotting.), his suggestion to post the calls of likely self-spotters is good. The chess community took; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00346.html (9,296 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: k2qmf@juno.com (k2qmf@juno.com); Date: Sat May 31 18:19:49 2003; Wow Guys, Life is too short for all this sh.. Lets just make it legal and have some FUN... 73, Ted K2QMF ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the int; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00347.html (8,899 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: k3ft@erols.com (Chuck); Date: Sat May 31 18:48:59 2003; Rick's point and Walt's post reference one item that we all have experience with. The 'SHAME' factor is quite effective at helping people to avoid wanting to try to stretch the rules, break em or wha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00348.html (9,118 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sun Jun 1 07:03:12 2003; k3ft@erols.com wrote: "but the SHAME factor tends to be powerful tool in helping people remind themselves to behave." SHAME = a painful emotion caused by consciousness of guilt As long as "we" are un; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00003.html (7,963 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A); Date: Wed Jun 4 18:01:46 2003; WWYC N4GI wrote: I think the legalization of automatic self-spotting is the only rational answer. What a piece of wisdom from YM! 10 minutes limit per self-spot will do. Easy to program... 73 de Mari; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00068.html (6,353 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] self-spotting (score: 1): Author: jljarvis@abs.adelphia.net (jljarvis); Date: Fri Apr 12 13:53:40 2002; Folks, Self-spotting is just one more 'difficult to administer' situation, where there is opportunity for deception, and no readily apparent solution. I would recommend keeping it simple. If you are; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00130.html (8,029 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-Spotting (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:34:51 -0700; Another point not yet mentioned with regards to self-spotting is that most contests specifically limit contest activity to certain bands. Self-spotting is considered a solicitation for contacts. For; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00274.html (7,804 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-Spotting (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:24:22 -0500; Is not self-spotting frowned upon *by the Cluster node operators*? (if for no other reason, because of the fear that self-spots by not-rare-enough-that-anyone-else-will-spot-them W stations will ove; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00296.html (7,392 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:38:38 -0800; I heard at least one station asking stations he worked (including me) to "PLEASE SPOT ME" during yesterday's NAQP RTTY. I wonder if he's already been DQ'd. I imagine he didn't know this was a no-no,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00207.html (7,050 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:45:05 -0600; Maybe he's sending in a CHECKLOG or maybe not sending in a log at all? Did anyone ask? 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN I imagine he didn't know this was a no-no, but that's a pretty brazen way to request assi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00214.html (8,436 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:32:55 -0600; That is wrong and they need to be reclassified and or DQed. I hope you informed the NAQP of this. W0MU I imagine he didn't know this was a no-no, but that's a pretty brazen way to request assistance; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00223.html (8,168 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 18:17:24 -0800; Remember that NAQP events are all 100W max power, no assistance permitted except for Multi-Ops. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00228.html (7,907 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: K3TN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 11:59:38 +0000 (UTC); I'm not a fan of the self spotting decision for HF contests, but I don't think it approaches mayhem - more just another level of erosion of old norms. The Reverse Beacon Network (https://www.reverseb; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-03/msg00001.html (7,615 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 09:41:01 -0500; Actually, the impact is even less than John suggests - the article on the RBN web site is badly outdated - last year in CQWWCW the RBN posted well over 10 million spots in the 48 hours. From the se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-03/msg00004.html (8,777 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:19:30 -0500; The people using the RBN are NOT the target of CW self spots. They already have the data. The target is the casual operators who form a large portion of the difference in the top scores (at least for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-03/msg00007.html (9,799 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]