Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Shorter\s+Time\s+to\s+Submit\s+Log\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Shorter\s+Time\s+to\s+Submit\s+Log\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Shorter Time to Submit Log (score: 1): Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:23:58 -0800; I have no objection to the suggestion that the Gentlemen's Agreement (GA) include a shorter time than specified by the sponsor's rules to submit logs. However, it needs to be reasonable. 15 minutes i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00317.html (7,962 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shorter Time to Submit Log (score: 1): Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:45:37 +0000; How would you determine if I'm taking a shot at Top Ten, by my score? That hardly seems fair. If I fall short of Top Ten, heck if I don't make Top Twenty, does that mean I'm a "casual contester"? Lo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00321.html (7,748 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shorter Time to Submit Log (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:49:09 -0800 (PST); Steve, You took the words right out of my mouth. Before clusters showed up, there was no assisted category, and no one worried if you called a directional CQ or not. Lets get back to the obvious-"ass; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00322.html (8,969 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shorter Time to Submit Log (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:19:42 -0000; Yep. That's why it's the only thing mentioned in the rules when dealing with being assisted. 73 -- Paul VO1HE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00327.html (9,450 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shorter Time to Submit Log (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 06:54:40 -0600; This question is "how do you know which side of the double standard you fall on?" It was already answered well but bears repeating. There are those who are trying to do their best - whether top-ten; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00330.html (8,024 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shorter Time to Submit Log (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:33:19 -0600; Exactly. In 25 years of radio, I've never heard, before this silly thread, any mention by anyone that a directional CQ during a contest was the least bit unethical. Or that there was anything wrong; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00340.html (10,150 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shorter Time to Submit Log (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:37:46 -0000; it if And here I thought we were all trying to "do our best" -- silly me! Will the marquis be needing a ladder to climb down off that tall horse? What in the name of Nose is this sudden emphasis on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00341.html (8,610 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]