Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmer\s+\-\s+a\s+sterile\s+debate\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - a sterile debate? (score: 1)
Author: don.field@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:40:02 +0200
The Skimmerdebate is getting more sterile by the minute, with most postings simplyreiterating emotionally held beliefs.  Lets startby knocking a few myths on the head:  - CW is inherently a mode to b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00417.html (11,092 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - a sterile debate? (score: 1)
Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
G3XTT's thoughtful analysis is quite good, but I do have one point I disagree on. First, what he is absolutely correct on: " Why hasthis suddenly come to a head when there have been technical Precise
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00437.html (8,264 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - a sterile debate? (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:22:08 +0000 (GMT)
Really, Really??? Same as III A 1 except the passive (self- spotting not allowed) use of DX spotting nets is allowed.<< If we read further in the rules and see the the definition of ASSISTED B. cate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00445.html (11,065 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu