- 1. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - a sterile debate? (score: 1)
- Author: don.field@gmail.com
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:40:02 +0200
- The Skimmerdebate is getting more sterile by the minute, with most postings simplyreiterating emotionally held beliefs. Lets startby knocking a few myths on the head: - CW is inherently a mode to b
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00417.html (11,092 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - a sterile debate? (score: 1)
- Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
- G3XTT's thoughtful analysis is quite good, but I do have one point I disagree on. First, what he is absolutely correct on: " Why hasthis suddenly come to a head when there have been technical Precise
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00437.html (8,264 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - a sterile debate? (score: 1)
- Author: k3bu@optimum.net
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:22:08 +0000 (GMT)
- Really, Really??? Same as III A 1 except the passive (self- spotting not allowed) use of DX spotting nets is allowed.<< If we read further in the rules and see the the definition of ASSISTED B. cate
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00445.html (11,065 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu