Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmer\s+\-\s+unassisted\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmer\s+\-\s+unassisted\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - unassisted (score: 1): Author: "Telegraphy.com" <trogo@telegraphy.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:03:21 -0500; The definition of "unassisted" is "not helped by anyone or ANYTHING" - that's pretty straightforward - why do people in insist on arguing over something so cut and dried. Do some folks really have to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00557.html (7,216 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - unassisted (score: 1): Author: "Telegraphy.com" <trogo@telegraphy.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:34:48 -0500; No I suggest the contest organizers should define in clear and certain terms what constitutes "assisted" and what is "unassisted" - then there would be no question. At least not until the next person; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00014.html (9,704 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]