Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmer\s+reverse\s+beacon\s+experiment\s+\-\s+update\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:51:13 -0500
Today I replaced the Skimmer software with a new version that permits you to select whether to forward all spots to Telnet, or just the ones that the software identifies as calling CQ. Depending on c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00178.html (7,417 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:42:01 +0100
The fun for a serious DXpedtion IS to manage big pileups, not to run lists with a "master of ceremony" 73 Peter In "spot everything mode, it reports every station it hears - you can imagine how usefu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00179.html (8,003 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 00:49:44 +0100
N4ZR: In "spot everything mode, it reports every station it hears - you can imagine how useful this would be for a DXpedition station managing a big pileup. There are two potential problems: wrong ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00180.html (7,566 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: Clive Whelan <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:03:17 +0000
Pete Sure, fantastic software indeed, and you are demonstrating what it is capable of. Perhaps the most profound implication is that it can render the use of DX clusters irrelevant, and therefore - a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00181.html (9,644 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 01:41:18 +0100
The logging program automatically integrates calls and frequencies into the band map as itīs reading the Telnet messages 73 Peter However , what I don't quite see is how the average Joe, or even the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00185.html (8,693 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:36:35 -0500
Hi Clive - the spots I'm making available on the Internet are generated by a US$13 (that's right, $13, in kit form) 20M SoftRock SDR taking its antenna feed from the RX antenna loop of my second radi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00186.html (11,785 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 06:59:04 -0600
Pete, Can this be fed into a regular packet cluster? Bill, W5VX Hi Clive - the spots I'm making available on the Internet are generated by a US$13 (that's right, $13, in kit form) 20M SoftRock SDR ta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00188.html (12,491 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:42:36 +0000
Now THAT would be a real zoo! You could of course do it with my wintelnetx spot sucker program. It can translate from user side spots (DX de ...) into either backbone(pcxx^...) or user sent spots (dx
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00189.html (15,351 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:41:43 -0500
Pete, Where are you getting the 20M SoftRock SDR kits from? I went looking online this morning (we were discussing projects this morning at the first meeting of the new WPA QRP Club) and I didn't com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00193.html (13,474 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:34:14 -0600
I was just thinking that something like this could do away with the self spotting stuff that seems to have everyone in an uproar. Just start up several of these in different areas of the country and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00195.html (16,430 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 14:18:08 -0500
Keep in mind, this is a first beta. Issues like how to integrate with, or stand up a separate network for, CW Skimmers are still a ways down the road. The idea of identifying spots by the owner of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00196.html (16,805 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 19:34:52 -0600
The grid square location of the skimmer in the comment field would yield relevant information, similar to how beacons identify their location in CW. Maybe something like K0RC/S for the spotting calls
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00199.html (19,187 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:49:37 +0000
On the other hand, I spent quite a bit of time over the last few days on 20 meters working some DX, calling CQ, and just sending my call. As far as I can tell Pete's Skimmer has NEVER ever found me.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00207.html (8,771 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu