Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimming\s+Along\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimming\s+Along\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Skimming Along (score: 1): Author: "Tom Taormina" <tom@k5rc.cc>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:32:08 -0700; I am not taking one side or another on this one, I just have two questions. First, will banning skimmers also include banning band scopes (panadaptors), waterfall displays and computer images from th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00537.html (8,843 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimming Along (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:11:20 -0400; I would hope that contests would not ban the skimmer. The reasons are not due to any ideas about more or less desirable entry status, but more on possibly turning one or another class into an anachro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00563.html (12,383 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimming Along (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:12:45 -0700 (PDT); Mike, again, I don't see anyone calling for a ban on the technology, just the appropriate place for it. Too, assisted should not be looked down upon as a category. It's not inferior, it's just a dif; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00571.html (9,015 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimming Along (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:33:11 -0700; Hi Tom I wouldn't think so as my waterfalls on the computers here don't show any callsigns, just that there is a station there. I acutally have to tune my radio to where the station is and copy the i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00586.html (7,967 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimming Along (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 13:25:09 -0400; There was a post here calling for a ban on it, forget who it was tho'. Agreed. In fact as a person who enjoys the bells and whistles of computers, as well as the knobs on my radio, I would be happy t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00014.html (11,840 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimming Along (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 12:38:19 -0700 (PDT); Mike, I've see that now and stand corrected... The jury is still out here on that ;o) Maybe I've seen and read too much SciFi... There's definitely good and bad, definitely a more philosophical discu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00020.html (12,194 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimming Along (score: 1): Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>; Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 07:48:30 +0200; Please, why would it be silly? It is only in the logic of tech development (with all the fine enthusiasm already at work in engineering skimmer setups quality will improve very quickly). All of us in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00035.html (8,129 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]