Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sponsors\s+need\s+to\s+make\s+packet\s+system\s+more\s+verifyable\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sponsors\s+need\s+to\s+make\s+packet\s+system\s+more\s+verifyable\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Sponsors need to make packet system more verifyable (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Sun Jun 15 11:53:33 2003; From the ongoing discussion: "And if you are honorable and watching packet, you're in the assisted category anyway, so you're not competing against the unassisted, so why should the unassisted care?"; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00192.html (7,029 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Sponsors need to make packet system more verifyable (score: 1): Author: ww3s@zoominternet.net (WW3S); Date: Sun Jun 15 22:39:04 2003; And this is what prompted me ( idiot/moron/loser) to wonder why the big deal about this? The packet users are noted with an " * " beside them so you know who used what; you can still tell who the to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00198.html (7,480 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]