Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Spoofed\s+Self\s+Spots\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Spoofed\s+Self\s+Spots\s*$/: 58 ]

Total 58 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 15:57:22 +0000; Steve: Its not that Im against technology. I love all those things you mentioned EXCEPT the packet spots. I just think that if we are communicating by radio we should use the radio to find, copy, and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00054.html (31,886 bytes)
42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: <wigi@kl0r.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:15:47 -0800; I noticed quite a few spoofed spots for us, and at least one spoofed self-spot. My biggest concern (and it is not really an issue in this past contest, since there were so many), is that someone migh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00055.html (34,266 bytes)
43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: John Dorr <cqk1ar@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:04:14 -0400; Hi Wigi and others, We can absolutely ID the spoofed spots over self-generated ones. So, you can all relax if you didnt spot yourself. 73, John, K1AR Sent from my iPhone _____________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00057.html (36,197 bytes)
44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Alan Higbie <alan.higbie@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 12:51:25 -0600; I am nostalgic too - but to get accurate recollection - just listen to contest recordings of W4BVV and others (in the 1960s) - broad receivers. clicks and dupe sheets. Nevertheless - still nostalgic.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00058.html (32,543 bytes)
45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 11:55:01 -0700; CQWW is the dumbest large contest going -- all you have to copy is the call for most QSOs, and if you're assisted, you don't even have to copy that! That, combined with the scoring rules heavily weig; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00059.html (9,143 bytes)
46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: John Dorr <cqk1ar@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 17:18:10 -0400; Jim, Dumbest contest is a little harsh. Nevertheless, I would point out that at least half of the contests participants are non-USA operators and indeed have to correctly copy the exchange/zone for t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00063.html (9,395 bytes)
47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:26:00 -0400; Having operated in PJ2 and having worked the majority of our 15,000 QSOs from stations in the USA, I'll say that we had to listen to the exchange for all of our QSOs - especially for USA stations. Fo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00065.html (9,436 bytes)
48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 02:14:20 +0000; Q: I work a station and they do not know their CQ zone or they give me a serial number, what should I put in the log? Log the zone based on their location. Q: A station gives me a serial number vs. t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00066.html (12,188 bytes)
49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Mark - N5OT <r-emails@n5ot.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 07:52:41 -0500; basin, make CQWW a complete turnoff for most of us living elsewhere. Easy, big boy. I don't live around the Atlantic basin, yet you don't speak for me. That broad brush is not helpful. Do you hav; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00069.html (9,786 bytes)
50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 13:39:48 +0000 (UTC); Data? I believe he's referring to the results of the contest, generally. 73, Ken, AB1J basin, make CQWW a complete turnoff for most of us living elsewhere. Easy, big boy. I don't live around the At; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00070.html (10,592 bytes)
51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Mark - N5OT <r-emails@n5ot.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:20:47 -0500; I am pretty sure the results of the contest would not support the statement that most of the people who do not live in the Atlantic basin are turned off by CQWW. At the least, it it would be dependen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00072.html (10,940 bytes)
52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:30:53 +0000; Some have mentioned that this nothing new. I beg to differ. I almost always take a look at my spots after a contest. I can count on one hand in 10 years how many I felt were spoofed and NONE were spo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00074.html (8,671 bytes)
53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 17:34:21 +0000 (UTC); Roger that. I misspoke. Not the first or last time. Someone needs to do a survey to determine attitudes. Maybe could determine from the number of participating hams compared to the total number in a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00075.html (12,302 bytes)
54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 13:33:24 -0700; It's available if anyone cares to look -- simply tabulate the ratio of logs submitted to regional population. Compare, for example, those ratios for WA, OR, and CA to those for W1, W2, and W3. For ex; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00077.html (9,309 bytes)
55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 13:39:29 -0700; Makes my point about the contest being dumb! The answer to the first question says it doesn't matter what I copy, or that I actually copy anything more than their call. And the answer to the second s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00078.html (10,387 bytes)
56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 00:48:55 +0000; https://cqww.com/rules_faq.htm CQ WW - Rules FAQ<https://cqww.com/rules_faq.htm> CQ WW Contest Rules - Frequently Asked Questions. The purpose of this page is to answer some of the common questions a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00079.html (12,191 bytes)
57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Mark - N5OT <r-emails@n5ot.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 07:12:00 -0600; K9YC said this: "... with the scoring rules heavily weighted to those around the Atlantic basin, make CQWW a complete turnoff for most of us living elsewhere." "It's available if anyone cares to look; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00093.html (9,983 bytes)
58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:43:39 -0800; Thanks for your offer, Mark. It could be a lot of work. The words I chose are descriptive, not quantitative. They will be defined quantitatively by work like you have volunteered to do! 73, Jim K9YC; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00094.html (9,529 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 58
Page: [1] [2] [3]