Hi Bob. If you are willing to do the analysis, I can provide you the mdb, or plain text file with all the callsings spotted and counts for each of them. I don't think anyone is supposed to defend the
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:24:37 -0500
Again...the object for me is to have fun with my choice of tools...or unassisted should I chose to do so. HAVE FUN1 73es, Jeff K3OQ Going to have to agree with yo Jeff. If you want to use packet and
K3LR was erroneously spoted as EK3LR about 100 times out of 37500 cases! Only the robots can be so accurate :-) 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU Add the 20 EK1LZ spots to all the others and it becomes a big p
I have just created a simple tool to create virtual logs and play with busted calls. Based on CQ WW CW 2012 public logs. Enter any call and see how many people have it in their logs. http://rate.pile
I haven't tried this in a contest but see no reason why it wouldn't get rid of the endless recurrence of bogus spots such as EK3LR so we don't have to keep cleaning them out of the bandmap. N1MM allo
Gee, that's not as bad as I thought it would be, given the number of logs and QSOs in CQWW. Maybe we contesters are better than we give ourselves credit for! 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beaco
Another dimension to this skimming thing is spotting on wrong frequencies. Or the wrong band. Take the RBN data for a day - a non-weekend day is better, as few stations actually on >1 band at once th
Great tool! I guess about 12 people failed to copy what K3LR actually sent for their zone LOL. I wonder how loud those people were copying K3LR. Zone 21 is pretty rare and to hear them 20 or 30 over
I have just created a simple tool to create virtual logs and play with busted calls. Based on CQ WW CW 2012 public logs. Enter any call and see how many people have it in their logs. http://rate.pile
I think psychologists would have a field day analyzing: PATIENT NUMBER ONE: those who must show-off their DXing prowess, copying skills etc. by spotting someone else. "Oh Boy", fellas look who I've f
Try tis one http://rate.pileup.ru/vlog.php?call=6474 73, Igor UA9CDC P.S. Our 6V7V call was busted 270 time in CQWW CW but the above one is really one off... Gee, that's not as bad as I thought it wo
Brett, Every contest I run into several stations on CW who actually transmitt 3 signals. Main signal is usually 59+30 or more and two side bands spaced 1-2 kHz from the main can be as loud as 59. No
One can also try 6V6V and BV7V using the same tool. Both are the variations of our 6V7V call used in CQWW CW. I admit, the call we used is not the easiest to copy. But still I am surprised to find so
Igor, thanks for this cool tool! One's got to be really "deaf" or (else?...) to confuse "2' and "5" while being "NON-ASSISTED". 73 Yuri VE3DZ Try tis one http://rate.pileup.ru/vlog.php?call=6474 73,
UA9CDC added: Another dimension to this skimming thing is spotting on wrong frequencies. Or the wrong band. Take the RBN data for a day - a non-weekend day is better, as few stations actually on >1 b
I agree with Tom's comments - with the skimmers/clusters used widely nowadays, having the same penalty for a busted call may also be reconsidered. Penalty for logging a busted callsing by clickonspot
VE3DZ wrote: One's got to be really "deaf" or (else?...) to confuse "2' and "5" while being "NON-ASSISTED". This is simple typing error when using numerical keypad. 6V7C out of 6V7V is also typing er
VR2BG/p wrote: How many wrong frequency spots are there on RBN? I had short 10 minutes CQ run in ON UBA CW contest this morning with 100 W and tribander on 14025,75 kHz. RBN had 3 spots on 14025,7 kH
I've added skimmers to the tool and now is more interesting to play with busted spots and with your own log as well. http://rate.pileup.ru/vlog.php?call=EK3LR&skimmers=on P.S. No dxc spots, only skim
Wow Valery. The addition of skimmer spots is really awesome. I can compare stations in two or more separate browser tabs and see the diferences in rate and spots. Super cool. Thx much. Martin, LU5DX