Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Summarizing\s+the\s+Skimmer\s+Accuracy\s+Thread\s*$/: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 01:59:23 +0000
S56A added: VR2BG/p wrote: How many wrong frequency spots are there on RBN? I had short 10 minutes CQ run in ON UBA CW contest this morning with 100 W and tribander on 14025,75 kHz. RBN had 3 spots o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00543.html (11,424 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 21:49:53 -0500
Bret, I am a little puzzled by your complaint. When you refer to "wrong-frequency spots" are you referring to spots that vary by 0.1-0.2 KHz, or to imagesequidistant from the center frequency of a gi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00546.html (13,120 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:33:56 +0000
Bret, I am a little puzzled by your complaint. When you refer to "wrong-frequency spots" are you referring to spots that vary by 0.1-0.2 KHz, or to imagesequidistant from the center frequency of a g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00596.html (12,590 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:35:26 -0500
Bret, send me your data in a form I can look at, and we can have a useful discussion. I can imagine several scenarios for what you describe - harmonics, dueling CQs, keyclicks, and so on. I'd love to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00601.html (10,440 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Jordan" <k4qpl@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:54:39 -0500
There are two explanations for reported frequency variations unless they are reported at EXACTLY the same moment in time--rx error or tx change. Many run stations, myself included, if that less than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00602.html (12,325 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 06:49:13 -0500
It also needs to be kept in mind that with rounding taking place at the sending Skimmer's Telnet server, an actual calibration difference of only a couple of Hz can lead to spots being 0.1 KHz apart.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00608.html (13,400 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: "Bryon \"Paul\" Veal" <bryonveal@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:06:47 -0700
I a famous for sending to the rarest DX and multipliers "N0AS" since I still use a paddle and after having N0AH, I still can't get the H out 10% of the time, or more like 100% to the rare stuff- Coul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00617.html (14,800 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:20:39 +0000
N4ZR continued: Bret, send me your data in a form I can look at, and we can have a useful discussion. I can imagine several scenarios for what you describe - harmonics, dueling CQs, keyclicks, and so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00621.html (12,538 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:40:30 +0100
VR2BG wrote: Since it's only certain skimmers sending wrong-freq spots, you can imagine all you want Pete, it won't change the fact that the receivers have spurious responses & if signals appear ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00623.html (9,351 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:03:13 -0500
Here is most of an e-mail I sent to Bret this morning. I took it off the reflector because I thought at the time that it was too long and complicated for this audience, but on second thought figured
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00625.html (15,808 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:25:40 +0100
N4ZR wrote: The two QS1Rs (out of over 60 regulars contributing to the RBN) continue to baffle us. I spent some Excell time with 150K RBN raw spots from quiet Feb. 26th. I didn't find any harmonics e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00628.html (10,698 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:22:53 -0500
see below 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com. For spots, please go to your favorite ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00631.html (11,979 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:34:52 +0000
I still find it interesting that on WEEKDAYS, I found so many RBN spots of EXACTLY THE SAME CALL, at EXACTLY THE SAME TIME (to the SECOND), on either another frequency on the same band, or on another
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00013.html (8,383 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 21:01:31 +0100
VR2BG wrote: I still find it interesting that on WEEKDAYS, I found so many RBN spots of EXACTLY THE SAME CALL, at EXACTLY THE SAME TIME (to the SECOND), on either another frequency on the same band,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00017.html (7,976 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:35:06 -0500
Bret, without data and specific numbers this is all just arm-waving. If you'd like to take a typical non-contest day (you can download each day's data from the Internet), and flag the busted frequenc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00018.html (9,707 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:37:54 +0000
S56A continued: VR2BG wrote: I still find it interesting that on WEEKDAYS, I found so many RBN spots of EXACTLY THE SAME CALL, at EXACTLY THE SAME TIME (to the SECOND), on either another frequency on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00029.html (9,350 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu