Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+THE\s+TRUTH\:\s+fcc\s+rf\s+guidelines\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] THE TRUTH: fcc rf guidelines (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (Doug KR2Q)
Date: Tue Dec 30 08:08:26 1997
<< The real problem is that the new regulations will provide one more wonderful weapon with which local governments and the attornies of ignorant non-amateur neighbors can bash us >> It is my opinion
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00477.html (9,730 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] THE TRUTH: fcc rf guidelines (score: 1)
Author: kurscj@oampc12.csg.mot.com (Chad Kurszewski WE9V)
Date: Tue Dec 30 08:08:36 1997
will No where is it your God given right to use 1500W. The pessimistic view would be: 1) You are still limited to 30' according to the town. 2) You now have to run QRP to meet the emmision standard.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00478.html (9,612 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] THE TRUTH: fcc rf guidelines (score: 1)
Author: no6x@inreach.com (Mike)
Date: Tue Dec 30 14:59:41 1997
NO???? Oh man! If you look at the rules though there is a time limit for the whole thing.... I need to go read again but I think it is 10 minutes, so you don't hae to be in compliance for the whole
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00481.html (8,236 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] THE TRUTH: fcc rf guidelines (score: 1)
Author: W3CF@aol.com (W3CF)
Date: Tue Dec 30 10:37:53 1997
<< They will still think that 30' is reasonable and you will have to turn down your power to to meed the ADDITIONAL FCC rule. I don't think that they will see those two rules as mutually exclusive, b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00484.html (9,949 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] THE TRUTH: fcc rf guidelines (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Tue Dec 30 10:58:47 1997
An interesting thought. Here's one data point that might apply during a RTTY contest: freq: 28.1 power out: 1500 watts KT-34XA (11dBd, according to KLM) 100' 9913 100% emission mode duty factor 70% t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00485.html (8,445 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] THE TRUTH: fcc rf guidelines (score: 1)
Author: aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (ROBERT WANDERER)
Date: Tue Dec 30 09:18:21 1997
I think there are two time averaging (both equalling 33-50% duty cycle or something like that) situations. I believe one was 10 or 15 minutes over a 30 minute period. Also, average power rather than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00491.html (9,038 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] THE TRUTH: fcc rf guidelines (score: 1)
Author: bobkathylangham@worldnet.att.net (bobkathylangham@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Wed Dec 31 09:15:30 1997
snip.. Doug, I agree that this could be some help when putting up a new tower, but what happens to those who have a small tower up now and don't have the dollars or land to raise a 100' tower? Just f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00504.html (8,315 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] THE TRUTH: fcc rf guidelines (score: 1)
Author: aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (ROBERT WANDERER)
Date: Tue Dec 30 09:18:21 1997
I think there are two time averaging (both equalling 33-50% duty cycle or something like that) situations. I believe one was 10 or 15 minutes over a 30 minute period. Also, average power rather than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00556.html (9,032 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] THE TRUTH: fcc rf guidelines (score: 1)
Author: aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (ROBERT WANDERER)
Date: Tue Dec 30 09:18:21 1997
I think there are two time averaging (both equalling 33-50% duty cycle or something like that) situations. I believe one was 10 or 15 minutes over a 30 minute period. Also, average power rather than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00592.html (9,026 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu